mindjet mindmanager 2012 pro downloadmac os x 10 5 leopard free software serial downloadmac os x 10 8 mountain lion free download full version isohyper studio 4 5 download
2015 CBS Interactive Inc.
Visual Basic 5.0 Runtime Module
Editors Note: has chosen not to ever provide a direct-download link because of this product and will be offering this page for informational purposes only.
From Microsoft: This package contains the many necessary files for running applications made out of Visual Basic 5.0. This package is updated because the release of Visual Studio Service Pack 3, so that it should provide every one of the files necessary to run the latest Visual Basic programs.
Microsoft must introduce Visual Basic 6.0 back
Microsoft must introduce Visual Basic 6.0 time for the market! Nobody Framework dependent programs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! VB6 is among the most powerful programming language!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We do not like or dependence Framework! Also, on the internet port anything from VB6 to Visual Vasic 6.0 is here now to stay!
Visual Basic 5.0 Runtime Module
Visual Basic 5.0 Runtime Module:
You are logged in as. Please submit your review for Visual Basic 5.0 Runtime Module
2. One-line summary: 10 characters minimum Count: 0 of 55 characters
3. Pros: 10 characters minimum Count: 0 of just one, 000 characters
4. Cons: 10 characters minimum Count: 0 of merely one, 000 characters
5. Summary: optional Count: 0 of a single, 500 characters
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited.
Note your submission might not appear immediately on our site.
Since youve already submitted a review just for this product, this submission are going to be added as a possible update in your original review.
Summary: 0 of just one, 000 characters
Add your individual message: 0 of merely one, 000 characters
If you imagine this comment is offensive or violates the CNETs Site Terms of Use, you may report it below it will not automatically take off the comment. Once reported, our staff are going to be notified as well as the comment are going to be reviewed.
Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, and other illegal content
Your message has become reported and are going to be reviewed by our staff.
Learn ways to use the Visual Basic 6.0 programming language
Inspect and edit any file, main memory, or disk/disk image.
Compile, debug, and run Java applications on your hard drive.
Write better-quality code, reduce security-related issues,
Edit plain text files, HTML documents, PHP, and Java code.
Install MS Visual Basic run-time files.
Print out your source code of your respective Visual Basic projects.
Send e-mail from the inside of your Visual Basic applications.
Debug your applications using this program.
Create multithreaded Visual Basic 6 applications.
Create professional quality technical documentation.
Add FTP capabilities for a Visual Basic, Access, and C
Hex edit, cut, copy, paste, insert, fill, and delete
CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
MMXII CBS Interactive Inc.
Please describe the issue you have using this software. This information is going to be sent to our editors for review.
Please pick a feedback type.
Please enter some.
Thank you for submitting an issue report! The Download team is invested in providing you with accurate software information.
For sometime, I have debated whether or never to post this entry. About 6 months ago, I wrote the majority of this article, then decided to not post it. So yeah, Im wishy-washy for this one. Since then, Microsoft has put plenty of emphasis on HTML5 and introduced Windows 8 and also the Metro UI, leaving many existing MS developers thinking about the future in their previous technology choices. With that in mind, I think its good to consider Microsofts treating VFP and the way their decision processes be employed in regard to development tools.
Can you think it has become over four years since Microsoft posted A Message to your Community and announced that Microsoft would cease development on Visual FoxPro? It has become over 36 months since Microsoft released VFP9 SP2 and Sedna, well as over six years since VFP 9.0 was published! While I was saddened that Microsoft made a decision to cancel VFP, I appreciated the sensitivity the Fox Team, particularly YAG, showed on the Fox community. However, back then, I wished Microsoft would've been more transparent and given a much more thorough explanation of these reasons for making that decision. YAG had been constrained as to what he could/should say as part of his position, and I imagine there seemed to be some disagreement while using decision in the Fox Team, but those are only guesses. Regardless, we didnt experience an official statement from Microsoft, apart from it was happening, plus the Fox community still existed to put together the reasons. That triggered comments like writing around the wall, head from the sand and conjecture on deficiency of sales vs. deficiency of marketing, etc. Ultimately, it comes down on the fact that VFP hasn't been a strategic product for Microsoft, but why was that product what does it mean? Answers cause more questions, but I believe that is worth exploring.
Note that blog entry is simply more conjecture/opinion. I do not have any more facts than you choose to do. I am just putting all of the pieces I have within the table and creating a picture. Over the past year or so, I have debated whether or never to write this, because it's a negative subject and obvious flame-bait. But I think plenty of time has passed now also it could be a positive thing. To move forward, you might have to forget about the past, which has helped me make it happen. I still use VFP as my primary tool, but it's helped me recover from Microsofts decision. It may also be useful in deciding the place you want to go from the future. Now, I am certainly not defending Microsoft or saying I agree using decision. I am just seeking to understand why they will make a business decision to discontinue FoxPro. Statements here can be obvious or old news, but I believe that it is helpful to pull it all together.
Enough disclaimers, lets get to your subject available. Microsoft states for some time that FoxPro wasn't a strategic product on their behalf. What does that mean? To my mind, a strategic technique is one that Microsoft would buy heavily and recommend since the primary path with regards to customers. MS would build upon the technology and form a total strategy around it. VB was strategic. COM was is strategic. Fox has not been. Why not? To answer that, I think you've got to examine why Microsoft bought Fox Software inside the first place.
So, why did Microsoft buy Fox Software. I will quote a piece of writing Jordan Powell wrote in FoxTalk when Access 1.0 and FoxPro 2.5 were going to ship:
Microsoft was working on its Access DBMS which relies on a modern variant from the BASIC language. It required been embarrassing for Microsoft to get such a glaring hole rolling around in its product lineup. They had no DBMS, along with their partnership with Ashton-Tate neglected to get Microsoft SQL Server up and running. Some with the marketing types at MS remarked that FoxPro was the most effective version of X-Base around, together with been wanting to talk Bill Gates into doing something concerning this. They knew that this X-Base language commanded a large segment of the market industry and that a program which used the X-Base language would have them into the DBMS market within a big way. They had the marketing resources to get behind FoxPro, and Fox had some intriguing and useful technology - - to never mention some very talented people, what type Microsoft likes.
The buying of Fox Software for 173 million in 1992 was very strategic for Microsoft, called the biggest corporate purchase Microsoft had ever produced up until this time. Borland had purchased Aston-Tates which included dBase III and IV, together Paradox. And growing in popularity back then was PowerBuilder since the king of client/server tools, with Sybase releasing PowerBuilder 12 a year ago ironically based about the free Visual Studio Shell runtime. Microsoft needed three things on the Fox Software deal the Fox developer team, the Fox technology, plus the customer business of FoxPro/FoxBase. Microsoft was only starting work towards Access and it had been more targeting power users, but there was clearly still some overlap. Visual Basic was still in the early days.
Basically, Microsoft wanted a stronger presence from the database market and they also were in severe necessity of database products, people, and technology. Fox Software was obviously a perfect fit for the children. To give you more context, in 1992 the xBase market used to be booming, Access Cirrus used to be in development, Visual Basic 1.0 ended up released and VB 2.0 what food was in development, along with the first relieve SQL Server for Windows wasn't until 1993.
I think should you asked anyone within the know at Microsoft, they might tell you which the Fox acquisition would have been a resounding success unlike other far more expensive acquisitions that Microsoft has dumped. They got an excellent product, key technology that made its way into a few more products, and valuable folks that went on for taking major roles within the company. Why then did FoxPro not share that much cla of success? I do not believe Microsoft had malicious offers to kill FoxPro in the beginning, however the landscape had changed, since it tends to do in technology. The xBase market declined.
FoxPro was and foremost a competitor from the xBase market. As that market declined, so did the price of FoxPro as being a strategic product to Microsoft. What led towards the decline of your technology that ended up so popular within the 80s and early 90s? Technology trends are never stand still, but allow me to share few key things which in my opinion diminished the xBase market:
dBASE IV: dBASE IV became a buggy disaster, and it had been two years before they released version 1.1. Borland bought Ashton-Tate, but tend to not undo the destruction. dBASE for Windows hasn't been released until 1994. This was great for FoxPro, which was crowned the biggest fish inside xBase pond, nevertheless the pond itself started shrink.
Lawsuit: Ashton-Tate sued Fox Software for cloning dBASE. The suit was dropped when Borland bought Ashton-Tate, nevertheless it could not have inspired confidence from the xBase market.
Client-Server: By the early 90s, client-server technology found in popularity and developers were start to flock towards database servers and client-server development tools like PowerBuilder and VB. At precisely the same time, Microsoft was attempting to enter the server market with Windows NT and SQL Server, so Im sure there was clearly strong emphasis about this style of development from their store. I believe there seemed to be talk of any FoxServer product at Fox Software, but it really never saw the light of day before the Microsoft acquisition.
Those are reasons the xBase market declined, but about now youre believing that VFP is so additional than an xBase tool. I couldnt agree more. VFP can be toe-to-toe with VB, PowerBuilder, , while others. If FoxPro was expected to go quietly into your night, someone forgot to express to the VFP 3.0 team, given that they transformed the Fox in to a full-fledged OOP development platform ready to the 32-bit world and beyond. So, why wasnt the emphasis there from Microsoft?
An important indicate make about Microsoft is simply because are a follower of development trends, not much of a leader. With a number of exceptions the VB GUI designer one thinks of, Microsoft hasn't been the one to make a development trend. Embrace and extend was their motto, and in addition they have done well your. Windows was Microsofts answer to your Mac. is Microsoft chasing Java to the enterprise. They follow current trends and so they do so mercilessly. Even now, Microsoft is emphasizing HTML5, leaving Silverlight developers thinking Wait, I thought we were within the cutting edge? It would be away from character for Microsoft to advertise and strategize around an item built for an industry that was trending downwards. Its nothing personal from the Fox, its merely in their DNA.
Even using the xBase decline, if FoxPro revenue had continued upward, I wouldnt be writing this post. Sales declined, and then there are several advantages for that:
Power Users: Going the many way to dBASE you can question whether it had been a platform for power users with development capabilities or possibly a platform for developers that power users are able to use. It was both. Visual FoxPro said squarely inside the developer category, and Access took over because the preferred database for power users. The result: much fewer licenses sold.
VB, SQL : VFP faced lots of competition using their company products within Microsoft. With the emphasis always around the latest trends, many developers felt compelled to advance to other technologies.
Visual FoxPro: Thats right, VFP itself. While VFP 3.0 became a massive improvement in development capabilities and almost all of us are happy your decision, that it was also a big leap from FoxPro 2.x with regard to learning curve. It took some developers a long time to make jump, plus some never did.
Not Invented Here Syndrome: Microsoft took an incredible product generating it a lot better, making their treating FoxPro each of the more frustrating. But Fox had been the stepchild and that it was never about to supersede other products developed internally. By time Microsoft purchased Fox, they already made significant investments in VB, Access, and SQL Server. Those will be Microsofts strategic products while Fox would continue serving the declining xBase market and otherwise fit between lines.
People have been foretelling the death of FoxPro since Microsoft got it in 1992. What made 2007 12 months when Microsoft finally chose to cancel it? Had sales declined on the point that Microsoft could not justify Fox development? Did they need to use the Fox Team in the rest of Microsoft? Did big customers go on to something else? Were the individuals who cared gone or not in a position to do anything regarding it? Your guess will be as good as mine. We will never know.
There certainly are a couple of ways to think about this: 1 Microsoft always planned to cancel Fox and in addition they finally got their way, or 2 despite Fox not being a strategic product, Microsoft carry on and create new versions for Fox developers. I tend to consider it as being the latter. While there was clearly always something of Microsofts dedication to FoxPro, by the turmoil VFP 5, it had become clear it would not be a strategic product. Per Ken Levys blog:
In the first years following the Fox Software merger, Microsoft put a massive effort and plenty of resources into creating VFP 3.0. There were about 50 people around the Fox team having a big marketing budget. In the following years, both Access and VB grew in business and also competed in ways while using VFP market and messaging, and because of the time VFP 5.0 premiered, many upper managers wanted Microsoft to merely end VFP there. In fact, they did for the short time. I was there, inside a meeting with 40 people, and also the formal announcement was made to your Fox team that VFP was dead. It was very early 1996, knowning that meeting lead for the Gartner Group releasing their report that VFP was dead, that had a major affect on future VFP sales.
Most of Microsofts competitors would've ended it in front of them and VFP 5 could have been the final version. So, the actual question isnt Why 2007?, its Why not 1996?. Ken Levy continues:
But the Fox staff along while using community helped convince the developer tools management to maintain VFP evolving while lowering the resources. In fact, the reason VFP lasted another decade with 4 more versions released was more to do with Windows sales than VFP sales. There are many Windows machines running VFP apps. When Steve Ballmer jumps around like monkey boy and yells developers, developers, developers, hes contemplating selling Windows and Office over sales of developer tools.
If VFP 5 ended up the last version, then I could possibly have never had the practical benefits of working together with Visual FoxPro, because I really didnt result in the jump from FoxPro 2.x until version 6.0. In fact, Im not sure where Id be today, as I took my current job way back in 2000 to upgrade a Fox 2.x app to VFP. So, Im definitely thankful Microsoft saw fit to keep development.
That said, Microsofts handling of VFP support ever since the announcement is appalling. VFP 9 SP2 introduced several bugs. After months of begging, there we were able to buy them to fix one key bug, but others remain which will never be fixed and must be worked around. Microsoft claims that VFP is supported until 2015, but Im sorry, it is not support. To be clear, Im not blaming the Fox Team because of this. Im blaming Microsoft for that fact that there was clearly no Fox Team and management was unwilling to offer resources to correct these problems. Real support ended if your Fox Team was disbanded and assigned for some other projects.
So, what now? Thats the important question Fox developers are thinking about or have answered. I are unsure about you, but I still be extremely busy with Visual FoxPro as my primary development tool. I also monitor new technologies since they are introduced having an eye towards the direction they could benefit me. Maybe that will likely be the subject of an future post.
Why wouldone support VFP when you are able to sell a replica of Access to every one user while selling only 1 copy of VFP to every one developer the way to go from marketeer Balmer s standpoint.
The canonical reason just for this has been that Foxpro apps sold copies of windows, not copies in the IDE
Hi, just ran into this randomly, however for heaven s sake, punctuate. We ve been executing it for centuries. We re taught to accomplish it in grade school. It s done for just a reason quicker to read and in some cases it wasn t commemorate you look lazy and sloppy. Have you considered exactly what a potential employer googling a message would contemplate this?
Earlier in 2010, your blog post was converted from Foxite s internal system to WordPress, and also this is the result. I haven t were built with a chance to repair it.
I are already a vfp developer since 1997, and also the cancellation of vfp by microsoft pains me. To me developers whether it be of vfp and other platform are invariably left orphaned wen such cancellation happen, considering that they have big applications developed about this plaforms which are running out there also it will take greater than time and money to convert the to new platforms.
Thanks Joel, your reasoning of events is sound as I always felt MS wanted to cannibalize the Fox engine for SQL. I cringe everytime I have to write code outside VFP to address what VFP can do within a few lines of code. If anyone is employing or finds a suitable alternative they appreciate, please post here. We keep use VFP 9 and MS-SQL, though the trend is to go I started using QuickBasic inside the day, then VB approach barcode systems but neither were ever really designed to do heavy database development, nor was Access Microsoft does a dis-service towards the development community by axing VFP and need Fulton never sold it directly to them. Sadly, not a soul has taken within the baton to hold it forward, so competent source code plus a cherished developer tool dies about the vine, while almost all of my colleagues have moved to Java. My two cents.
dBASE was initially exposed in my experience almost 30 years ago at the begining of 1980s. I are already developing PC applications more than 20 years using dBASE, FoxPro and VFP5. I regret that Microsoft have not developed anything for me or some other VFP developer to convert or perhaps help convert a VFP application into another language. As Microsoft Office carries on evolve, my VFP5-based applications are don't compatible with Office 2007 and beyond. I can don't invoke an Excel worksheet and send data for it. Can anyone figure out whether this concern can be solved if I upgrade my VFP5 to VFP9?
Now that this PC publication rack shrinking, Microsoft Access and VB will become Not a Strategic Product. I hope someone will port the VFP engine to your Android system so all my previous application systems could be ported to Android platform.
Since then, I have tried VFP 9 SP2 with Office 2010. The problem appeared to disappear.
or but you could possibly have discovered these already.
thanks due to this article, which makes many sense.
I are already a Foxpro developer for two decades, and I plan to be a Foxpro developer for an additional pair 10 years. I have converted among my projects from VFP, and can refrain from doing so using the other, big projects I focus on. Why? Isn t Foxpro obsolete? Isn t it the perfect time to jump the ship? I used to imagine that myself but I don t anymore. The problem is, certainly, that VFP is just not being developed any additional by MSFT or whoever, and then there are other, modern-day products. But I make a journey throughout the main other products. I have looked, Java, C/QT, and as well at pure HTML5/Javascript products. In Java, the situation is a similar: Nothing much happening anymore regarding desktop applications. It all can be obsolete, much like VFP. So why bother? The only promising tools I found are Node/HTLM5, Javascript/CSS tools. Also for desktop applications. That seems to be the long run. But it should be to early now to embrace fraxel treatments. Wait some years, then look again.
When I take a look at /C/Winforms program, which replaced hmo's VFP program, I must say, VFP is far more efficient. I need about five times as much code as with VFP to accomplish the identical. And: program has become about as modern as my VFP applications. It is, the truth is, outdated, 24 months after that it was rolled out.
Also I don t believe anymore that MSFT will kill VFP in one from the next Windows versions. Win8 is really a desaster, and MSFT will stay away from giving up any established technology that helps Windows. VFP and VB6 and each of the other 32-bit apps will likely be supported for quite some time. The hype about hand-held phones replacing fully sized computers will die down, because it is definitely not possible to achieve that. MSFT may even come back in VFP, but I don t predict that.
Today VFP is still the very best tool for database desktop applications in Windows should you use it with SQL Server within the backend. That s very easy to do, and provides you a robust technology that will run on Windows for several years. Of course I would want to change to a technology that basically promises more future than VFP. But my impression is the fact that that technology just won't exist yet.
Yes, the technology won't exist yet, as well as a SQL is very easy to hack. Light Switch is a lot behind the VFP 9 technology. Im developing web applications and iPhone/iPad apps, however Im using VFP tables to own this apps. They designed to make, and I think for not doing they can be putting at an increased risk many large businesses that switch to SQL. Im repeating, SQL data is simple to hack can compare to a local data VFP ORACLE
Hi everyone, I am using VFP9 and I frankly attempted to switch for the new Era, by trying MySQL and in some cases SQL Server, but very frankly i have found VFP far more powerful with regard to an effective relational database that you may link to like a developer from another RAD or GUI development tool to make your user interface to produce modern looking and appealing.
In the regard of discontinuing FoxPro, I suggest for any class of all over the world developers to look at the responsibility to deal with the progression of VFP them selves, like what Delphi developers did in Lazarus Free Delphi RAD.
Thanks Joel with this most informative piece. There is usually a proverb: THE FARTHER BACKWARDS WE LOOK, THE FARTHER FORWARDS WE SEE! In light of all development and also the cancellation of Fox by MS, your article is usually a resource to anyone who would like to think next 5 a decade as to what s most workable presently or even in due course.
The things I miss most about FoxPro have there been very early: the Command Window, the info browser as well as the desktop. I think it s a cognitive coordination thing but those three features made the real difference to me. When I look for just a replacement for FoxPro those will be the things I am seeking first and I am not finding it. For example, the Visual Studio Command Window is usually a weak thing.
The language used doesn t matter too much for me. I went so far as to possess Fox run Perl statements through the command window and display the results within the desktop like they were Fox commands. Limited success but suppose the power Maybe an improved programmer could fare best.
I hope some from the developers describing themselves as what Foxpro needs to have become be aware. If so, please study these 3 elements carefully. A lot of thought was placed into making them, I m sure.
hello guys! good day! to all or any of you there, I was working for an instructor pc subjects and i also taught programming i used Foxpro for 13 years, as it's a user friendly IDE and an easy task to understand the code, its object, SQL, plus the organization of panels are pretty understandable and it also has the bonus on vb with access, html. because, it incorporates them simultaneously Foxpro, there may be database, SQL, programming software, with shell and GUI what i'm saying is Excellent software created that is known. however it gives me pain. when microsoft discontinue the item.
the idea i'm sure, microsoft seriously considered monopoly it development thanks towards the open source, let me shift in their mind.
I am an Xbase developer from dbase III plus. I am still using VFP 9.0 now. Xbase language foxpro data cursor is perfect match to fit the majority of my supporting industry is small business. Our industry is using a simple file server and under 20 PCs in a very small LAN. I have tried in diff solution to adjust to our clients requirments, including HTML CSS SQL crystal report SQL, ACCESS SQL, JAVA etc. Those of them are a lot of addon parties; I think you should all in one solution. Program code compiler report writer quick data handler input form simple programming language, much expected! I tried unix FOX 2.X, it is rather great in text mode, it's free to under now. Therefore, I am looking towards an open source VFP in future years.
I am a Foxpro developer, as I have already been since 1991. I have had my grounding in dBase 111 Plus, Foxpro For Dos from 2.0 to 2.6, Visual Foxpro 6, 7, 8 and after this 9. Visual Foxpro 6.0 and 9.0 include the best in the group by far and away.
I still develop and make use of the product for some other engines like MySql.
I prefer to push foxpro on the limit and build data storage linkages to engines using foxpro since the application development environment and report generation engine. Foxpro 9.0 is capable of allow to the creation of classes to produce functionality for cross-platform access and manipulation.
Just planned to thank you for your great jot down. I have finally had the capacity to sleep at nighttime since I stopped supporting those named vendors. I retired during the past year and have not missed just one day on the confusion and frustration brought about through the product support supplied through the various vendors of dbms. I am sure there is really a special invest Hell reserved just and justly on their behalf. Thanks to the trip down memory lane.
4 thoz hu komplane bout speling an such: Who made you perfect?
Is still it possible to acquire hold of VFP?
If you mean could you still buy VFP?, the solution is yes. Ask about the Universal Thread or maybe your favorite forum for reliable places to get, or you may find plenty on Google. Versions 7-9 are still contained in an MSDN subscription.
It is very desperated while sometimes ago once i heard the discontinuation of services to VFP by MS. I am too a VFP lover in a very long time run. My concern really matter when connecting to SQL server, i always had to code extra lines. Guys, can t we generate a VFP community to take this message to MS to be a matter of restructuring and see if any updates or possibly a new version of VFP being launched to MSVS.
I think, it really is really an area of proper message delivery to broadband MICROSOFT to change a very new page of VFP version change.
I happen to be developing in VFP ever since the 90 s and I made a examine upgrade to every new edition that MS released. I have also decreased the need to switch path b/c MS stopped development. I tried, /PHP and used MySQL/MS SQL. I have circled time for VFP anytime. I am a database applications developer and then there still even now is no better tool than Visual FoxPro to cultivate our applications in. For modern interfaces look into ActiveVFP on VFPx CodePlex it is an easy task to setup also it allows you to target all in the new devices using VFP.
My path through database land: CCA, Omnis, dBase3, Clipper Summer87, VFP6, VFP9, Postgres, now reluctantly SQLServer. A small VFP6 system I coded in 1999 remains running. Today, after being retired for 4 years I went to that old spot to find it alive and well. In demand for a few tweaks for being fair. For example VFP6 will still only export 16000 ish records in xls format. Soon fixed by subdividing and filtering a large archive table that was growing like topsy for many years. In my defence, a much better system had been within the horizon for just a decade but never arrived to enhance my bespoke solution. When it finally does I may be confident that that preserved data might be unlocked easily from a niche standard file format except for how much longer?
I recently re-engineered a method of mine from VFP9 to Why? Because of future maintainability and, it needs to be said, because its a non-profit making application and cooperative development using a shoestring will be less using the free Express offerings. Faced with being forced to RAD a data heavy appplication in a short time span I d still choose VFP but, like parts on the anatomy everybody comes with an and Excel. A pal within my motorcycle club even heroically designed a serial comms driven timing results application in Excel. I thought of re-performing it in VFP but sadly made a decision to go together with the flow and VB. Give me a tremendous text file of web data in even only vaguely structured form though and I ll still consider VFP9 to parse it into something meaningful.
Microsoft counted on your loyalty in their mind. That is why they chose to discontinue VFP. Why are we discussing moving a substandard quality product to VFP9 for desktop application and database development, when they can be cancelling his or her Microsoft VFP. Switch to Oracle or some other company if you desire to send them the content of keeping VFP. I for starters always recommend non Microsoft products to customers. Anything from databases to software development packages I inform them don t choose MS, and I say to them about VFP. You can be surprised at the quantity of developers don t have in mind the VFP MS story. If a company screws you over don t bow in their mind and buy there next product. I use both products, VFP was an A compared for the PRODUCT. VFP did things into two lines that you've to save data for and code. It was an intergrated database, forms, and reports package everything in one. In all my years I do not have seen an even better product for computer science than VFP and MS discontinued it. Like the Xbox vs PS switch if you need to get there attention don t stay MS or they'll do it to your account again.
I found this seeking vfp 9 service pack 2, microsofts site wasn't responding. Glad to view its still active. I have dealt with Foxpro since s its inception back with what the mid 80 s. I worked being a system programmer to get a manufacturing company which had written their whole operations system in Foxpro for Dos. which if windows 7 would run, I would nevertheless be using. Plain and simple foxpro worked and did wonders. The version for Unix died pretty quickly, back inside 90 s I became a consultant for an additional pair manufacturing company which was Unix based and hired me to rewrite their teleshopping system. Loved the developers conference in San Diego when Microsoft introduced version 3.0 Boy was a big deal, met and this people there. I started to work for the data management company and there is no additional options in our opinion. I still might get foxpro for windows to be effective under XP mode in windows 7 when I need something which I find better to do inside older version, but 9 is my normal daily db. I do are employed in the direct mail industry therefore you constantly manipulate/format raw data for addressing variable printing and I cannot imagine any other merchandise that would can work this way. Some such as junk they call access, I have never had time to stand it. Even our current mailing software packages are borland dbase engine driven.! is for years. It is often a shame a thief can t come out with something that is near what even foxpro was aside from visual. I purchased Alpha and this works but I m addicted towards the command window along with the ability to it is able to interactive and require thinking. guess I am a dying breed.!
After ages developing inside the dBase IIIFPVFP world, I semi-retired about 4 years back. A year or two back, a try from a large company got me back in to the workforce, as they inherited a well used DOS FP 2.5 app, which no-one understood. Fortunately to me, the app, written back from the mid 80 s resembles a version of SBT Accounting, which I cut my coding teeth on, made use of then.
While a call to replace this app remains underway, I keep keep this old girl ticking away they have it temperamental moments, with new versions of Windows. But, we manage to help keep things moving.