internet download manager video playerhalo combat evolved for computer downloadkaspersky internet security 2013 download freelemonade tycoon free download full version
Engineering professional?
Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
code below into the site.
Whenever I print MAthcad models into a PDF file using Acrobat writer the symblos such as change to?. Alos I get double?? and reverse?.
Is video Nathcad bug something like that to do with Acrobat?
Are you using PDFWriter or Distiller? PDFWriter is fairly lame and has now problems, in spite of Word documents. Distiller is very much much more capable and robust.
I originall used Acrobat writer. Then I tried Distiller and it also hung Mathcad?
I have Acrobat 4 with Mathcad 11 and still have had no problems.
suggest you reinstall one of the programs.
Mathcad 2000 works fine with Acrobat PDF.
However you won't work with earlier versions of Mathcad, for instance Mathcad 6:
I be employed in Mathcad 6 and after that read and save in Mathcad 200 then print to Distiller in Acrobat PDF format.
I use MathCAD 7 and print into a postscript file utilizing a standard color printer driver, which can be then transformed into pdf via adobe distiller 4
This method has confirmed to be the most reliable in my opinion, with accomplishment every time.
Even thought Destiller perform a lot better than Writer, I had similar challenge with Word and also other pdf files. The solution was upgrade the acrobat font library.
I guess this is a potential issue with MathCad. Try modify the font as part of your MathCad document.
SUGGESTION: Try changing the : sign by, select MATH, OPTION, DISPLAY, and modify the default for EQUAL. Print with Writer again and view if help.
If you find a hangup when printing from anything right to Distiller or Distiller Assistant, then take action in two steps.
First, setup a dummy ps printer in Windows, that can print to file for. It can be an Apple color laserprinter, as well like that. You dont need to achieve the printer, This is just a collection of parameters make use of when paper file is established.
1. Print from Mathcad to the dummy printer, which makes a file on disk. This will likely be a print file inside postscript language format.
2. Start Distiller, and employ it to open printed file and make a PDF file. You can confuse job choices for font embedding, etc, just as much as you need. tweak settings, distill file. check file, repeat if required. When you understand right, save the job selections for future use.
You should tell distiller in which the fonts are that Mathcad is definitely.
Anyway- this prevents hangups when printing, and allows quicker experimentation with job options, etc.
Please inform us here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons for example off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums totally free of inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will look at this and take appropriate action.
Click Here to become listed on Eng-Tips and discuss with other members!
Companies expect many savings after they move their applications for the cloud, however, these savings aren
Because it s more pleasurable than getting there within a straight line.
Ever since PTC bought Mathcad looking at the original developers, Mathsoft, in 2006 the longer term for the product is uncertain. The first PTC-led release with the software, Mathcad 14, followed three months later to mixed reviews also it s been very quiet since that time. The only indication of life throughout the last couple of years may be a few minor bug-fix releases which, to become perfectly frank, is quite insignificant compared to your competition.
All in this led me to write down an article last June 2009 called Is Mathcad Dying? which garnered quite plenty of feedback from their Mathcad user community and from PTC themselves. The reaction on the user community ranged from people calling me some colourful names right through to those who agreed with high of what I said and all things in between. It quickly became apparent that there was obviously a large user community who have been fervently hoping that PTC would take action special with Mathcad in lieu of let it wither and die. These users think Mathcad brings something unique towards the technical software landscape; a thing that isn t supplied by the likes of Mathematica, MATLAB and Maple and in addition they didn t need it to go away.
In the meantime, some on the people at PTC contacted with me to express to me that Mathcad is a lot from dying. I found out that not only would have been a new launch of Mathcad about the cards Mathcad 15 but them to be also focusing on what was essentially an entire reboot on the system called Mathcad Prime. They had also performed an enclosed company restructure which included the development of a business unit especially for Mathcad; this, I was told, will allow them to do a lot more with Mathcad than was done before. It all sounded thrilling and I was looking forward to your host of public updates but it all went very quiet again.
One of my contacts at PTC sent me a tweet last week to say that I may very well be interested in a very blog post at and he was right. Finally, anything that I have been told in confidence continues to be made official plus more besides. Mathcad 15 will likely be released later in 2010. The date for Mathcad Prime might be a more vague but 2011 may seem like a distinct possibility and there will probably be a virtual conference in mid-March where PTC will inform us more to do with its Mathcad strategy I ve already registered.
I need to confess that I haven't been hot for Mathcad, preferring to utilize MATLAB, Mathematica and Maple, but I are actually deeply in awe of the loyalty shown by several of its long-term users. Some of these users are already kind enough to accept the time to show me why they presume that Mathcad deserves such allegiance and I now realise that a few of my earlier comments for the product wasn't as well planned out as they should are actually. So, I hope that these new developments by PTC not just repays this loyalty but in addition produces a product which I would want to make use of myself.
Update 1st July 2010: Mathcad 15 has become released now over 36 months since the final version if I recall correctly plus the list of latest features appears being rather underwhelming in the beginning. I ll write more when I get my copy in the event that there is more to publish about. I guess PTC are putting a bunch of their resources into Mathcad Prime right this moment.
January 29th, 2010 at 21:12
Thanks to take the time for it to post a thoughtful review here. Indeed, we've got passionate users as well as that, we're grateful. Weve been hard at work, centering on a new creation that aims to boost usability of Mathcad. I understand youre not hot for Mathcad, but thank you for objectivity. Perhaps you could share the reasons you like the other tools over Mathcad. In any event, thanks for that note, therefore we look forward to your continuing coverage and commentary.
February 10th, 2010 at 00:41
Mathcad launched a following because like TurboCad vs AutoCad, Mathcad was originally geared towards the low end with the market. The products which you prefer are quality 1, 000, and like AutoCad can't be afforded through the average user.
Sadly, it seems that PTC desires taking Mathcad as direction. For a single user, it is possible to catch their 99.00 single user special for Mathcad 14 without any maintenance support or updates. If you want the support, you should pay throughout the nose in contrast to the 99 price. I hope that PTC will switch course and keep time frame end market planned with Mathcad 15.
February 10th, 2010 at 17:13
ardneh I maintain mathematical software in a large UK University so I usually worry about educational site-license costs as an alternative to individual licenses. Roughly speaking, a niche site license for Mathcad costs approximately the same as Maple. Maple is infinitely more capable for me.
Mike B Mathcad is responsible for me outright pain throughout the years. My first guide to it was in version 12 for you was a challenge with its xml handling. The practical upshot in this was that it had been corrupting plenty of student s work. I discovered that I could recover their work by hand-editing the xml source nevertheless it took AGES. Mathsoft as it had been then couldn t present you with a better solution at time so I worked to the night for just a week recovering over 100 student assessments. Thankfully, the workaround was simple don t save files inside the new xml format utilize old format instead. The academic who I was supporting wasn t pleased with the situation but as I had saved the specific situation he wasn t hurt a great deal that he needed to move far from Mathcad.
Version 13 was pretty solid didn t cause me much grief at all but we were forced to upgrade to version 14 at short notice. The sudden move coming from a Maple symbolic kernel to some Mupad one caused this same academic some problems and I were required to help him rewrite a number of his course notes. Then we were hit with the Print Preview bug which had been initially blamed on me since I was the guy who had deployed Mathcad to your clusters. People assumed that I were to blame instead of Mathcad itself.
The only positive point for Mathcad, for me, could it be s WYSIWYG whiteboard-like interface. In every other place it loses towards the competition.
The recent updates haven t provided us with much good value.
Its programming language can be quite weak in comparison to almost anything.
All this is simply my opinion obviously. One with the reasons I write this stuff is because, if I am wrong, then someone may ultimately put me straight.
February 10th, 2010 at 17:43
I like Mathcad because I can quickly begin a new project following a year of not using Mathcad. And since Mathcad sheets are meant to get shared and also a full package is needed to utilize them, the fact that additional features are not added quickly into Mathcad helps give new worksheets a large user base.
But my experience is bringing about me to hedge my bets. Mathcad 13 worked well, however, if I moved with a new Vista based computer, some graphics didn't display properly. The support would have been to upgrade to Mathcad 14 with the special introductory price. Okay fine. This works okay, nonetheless it crashes when I perform a print preview. Support is to become a maintenance package to obtain the latest maintenance release special introductory pricing though. Okay fine.
Well it s almost time for the new computer. It might have Windows 7. Will I need to fork over more to discover the license moved from computer on the next? The original purchase allowed a transferable license, but which was the company beore PTC.
I am trying mathematica 7 on linux now but period of time purchase price doesn't allow me make use of it for work. It s definitely harder to master than Mathcad.
Mathcad should take a step to improve. How long before someone merges Basketnotes, jmath, and Euler into something nearly as effective?
February 11th, 2010 at 10:59
Another gripe I have about mathcad is platform support. A Maple site license same cost as being a Mathcad one give or take allows our users to put in it on Windows, Mac and Linux. Mathcad is windows only and then we get less users able to take selling point of it.
February 11th, 2010 at 11:00
Kirby I agree Mathematica is harder to learn but it really is so so worthwhile. The things I are capable of doing with only a few lines of code. Same costs MATLAB and SAGE.
February 15th, 2010 at 15:28
Kirby, The Mathcad Print Preview bug was fixed within the M020 release. Initially PTC required maintenance to get into that but at some part they changed the male mind and made it an issue that could be downloaded to get more system. I do not determine if it is still availiable nevertheless, you should try contacting them again.
I manipulate Mathcad since early 90 s. I have signed up to the conference to view what Mathcad 15 will bring towards the table I will likely upgrade to 15. I was never to impressed with Mathcad 14.O M020. I was required to do a considerable amount of rework on a few of my worksheets to get the crooks to calculate properly using MuPad.
I upgraded to windows 7 and luckily my re-installation of Mathcad 14 went with out a hitch, and may seem to run fine under windows 7 after I got an new license file.
I m an engineering student and employ MathCAD, although I ve tried Maple and Mathematica. Despite it s flaws my preference lies with MathCAD as a result of it s seamless handling of units. All the other programs have very cumbersome unit implementations.
The the one thing I really miss in MathCAD can be an improved typesetting feature with table of contents, chapter/sections and the like. The perfect solution could be full LaTeX integration, but that s not going to happen.
I ve been dealing with Mathcad for several years. I don t do just about anything particularly advanced, just utilize it for basic engineering calculations. However, I do find some ridiculous features.
Why can t I alter the calculation order to relocate across pages so something with the bottom of top 10 is evaluated before something on the top of page 2. I can get round this using global definitions but then printed order is screwed up. Otherwise I just waste tons of screen space.
Also, work needs doing to create the layout more sensible. I need for being able to insert tables with full Mathcad functionality. I either must align lots of matrices or utilize an excel component and loose the system capability.
How does Mathematica or Mample compare? The cumbersome units mentioned by Anders doesn t bode well.
I would not like version 14; lots of my templates programed looping and matrix manipulation wouldn't work exactly the same so I whent back in version 2001. I know that there have already been some changes, but who wants to should revisit complex templates and connect.
Also, I am noticing a tren one of many resent graduating engineers I should interview applying with my firm who are certainly not as informed about MathCAD as the ones from just a few years ago who have been. Not even NASA TEC Trens journal is puplishing articles that used MathCAD as before.
Is PTC killing th goose that lays the golden eggs???
I ve been a MathCAD user since version 2 and still have spent plenty of money updating through the years to version 14. I have not been very happy with PTC s policies about getting updates although I eventually was able to obtain M020 version despite the fact that I don t pay for your maintenance agreement.
I recently installed MathCAD 14 onto a Dell Studio XPS Desktop with i7 processor after upgrading from Win7 Home Premium 64-bit to Win7 Pro see for further computer info. The installation may seem to have worked OK although program will not plot out mesh plots. I haven t spent enough time around the computer to discover other problems.
I see in PTC s advertisements that Mcad 15 has Win7 support so hopefully they fixed the condition although it will be nice as long as they came up which has a fix for Mcad 14. One with the other what is known as selling points they have is A second MathCAD License FREE. This is really nothing new however the same old license agreement that permitted you to legally put a replica onto a house computer. The only difference will be that they indicate the property use license expires with maintenance. I m unclear how they decide to enforce this but I don t such as the plan since I occasionally will give you results on MathCAD in your own home.
As a substitute for MathCAD I ve been using Octave that's very close to Matlab. The price is proper free. I haven t had possible opportunity to try it with Win7.
I do like MathCAD s WYSIWYG whiteboard-like interface along with the units feature though the alternative software packages are also starting to look better with the price at the same time as lacking to deal with PTC s poor and expensive support.
Anyone else having Win7 issues with MathCAD 14?
I ended up being using Mathcad extensively since first DOS version was introduced. I remained a loyal customer/user until Mathcad 14. The first impetus to get off Mathcad was caused because of the lack of patches or bug fixes. Instead, I was instructed to purchase an upgrade to fix an issue that was broken.
Also I believe the marketing policy changed in the future. For example, like a user of Mathcad you'd probably receive a contact giving notice of a technology with indicated upgrade price. If you would not upgrade immediately, you'd probably receive another email at some later time with a brand new, special lower upgrade price. If you waited even longer, you should receive just one more email with another lower updgrade price. To me, this was obviously a terrible business practice. That sort of marketing coupled with all the numerous bugs inside the first launch of Mathcad 14 was almost enough to avoid using the tool. At some time, I had did start to migrate to Matlab and Maple. The final straw, as they say, was the belief that Mathcad abrubtly moved from your Maple symbolic engine to Mupad. Two completely different packages with regards to syntax. Due towards the above, Mathcad 14 is my last upgrade. I now use Maple extensively.
With the above mentioned said, and given my knowledge about Maple, I assume that Mathcad s whiteboard emulation is superior to Maple. I do miss by using their interface, however, my newer Mathcad experiences 2008, 2009, 2010 have remaining me sorely disappointed.
One thing that puts Mathcad beyond its competitors would be the ability to create very nice-looking documents. I purchased both Mathematica and Maple also as Mathcad, plus the other programs do not do just about anything like what Mathcad does.
I can mix text, graphics, and mathematics in whatever way I want to. That, in my opinion, is quite important. I am an educator, and I utilize it to produce handouts and internet-based text for my students. They don t have for being familiar at all with all the program to learn what I produce by using it and to follow what s there. And, it s much easier to try and do this with Mathcad than it could well be with a word processor.
The nice integration involving the symbolic and numeric capabilities can be another plus.
For those who may not all be computer savvy, it s much easier to master than the other software. I teach an application in computational physics, so we use Mathcad because course. I would need to spend quite a lot more time teaching syntax with some other environment.
Is Mathcad as powerful becasue it is competitors? Well, no; but often you don t need those extra tools. For most tasks, Mathcad has an abundance of power. It is also faster at some tasks than Maple is.
Thanks on your comments. Which tasks will it be faster than Maple at?
I are actually using MathCAD ever since the DOS days As you'll be able to see, I am a devoted follower, but because 14 arrived, I have already been very disappointed. The issue I have isn't trusting should the calculations updated. I have found hard way that 14 on Vista I have confirmed this matter with others using XP won't always automatically update answers. Sometimes just saving the file will update it yet maybe I must close and reopen the file.
This one issue is mainly responsible for me to consider other options. Hey PTC, are you currently catching this? And this PTC maintenance game is usually a joke. Perhaps they will do this with ProE along with other high end code, but they is going to be walking far from their grass roots support base.
I ve ended up been a lasting MathCAD user since first MathCAD, with regular updates every since, and I just saw a youtube video about MathCAD 15.
I now feel that PTC isn't going to have the expertise to deal with MathCAD and haven t ever endured any real expertise simply because bought it. I think that their efforts besides fall short, however are just plain pathetic.
What we need is really a White Knight to swoop in, take MathCAD off their hands. Promise PTC to complete a job 100 times much better than PTC that is to mention, plain and simple good upkeep, then make MathCAD into the thing it should be. That could well be more systematic, more complete, more uniform, the first class API, add multi-CPU capable, etc.
Say! Google, have you been listening? PLEASE buy mathCAD and make to your World Class product. Pretty please????!!!!!
I would like to view everyone talk up Google buying MathCAD and get these to hire some high grade mathematics types, team these with some good interface designers, and build it into the long term Chrome Operating system, next to each other and appropriate for all the cool stuffs that Google is doing.
I are actually a Mathcad user since 1987 when I bought 2.0 DOS. I exclusively use Mathcad 2000 Pro on XP Pro. The patches have elected it quite usable eventhough it still crashes more frequently than I like; turning off Automatic Calculation after you re developing or editing a function helps a great deal to prevent crashes. I upgraded to Mathcad 13 on XP Pro and uninstalled it after having a few days only crash, crash, and crash. I am a Civil Engineer and also a huge fan of Mathcad that has a ton of functions that I have developed through the years. My library could be the reason I will continue to utilize 2000 Pro until I retire in several years; frankly, I don t offer a damn about upgrades since I don t employ all of 2000 Pro s features anyway. I only hope it's going to run fine on Windows 7 since I will probably need to abandon XP Pro inside the near future only to remain up to date with other software.
Files for Mathcad 15 dlls and exes have version number 14.1.0.436. That is Mathcad 15 is Mathcad 14 and also a bit. Note to setup Mathcad 15, Mathcad 14 if present has to be un-installed first but this will not apply to 11, 12 or 13.
Thanks with the info Paul. This upgrade gets less impressive from the second.
Hi Mike, Thanks to you and every one of the readers for the comments regarding Mathcad 15.0. We always pride ourselves around the passionate community which has grown through the years around Mathcad. We are listening and constantly appreciate feedback, whether positive or negative.
Though Mathcad 15.0 may not seem like a serious release, recall that any of us initially planned to look from 14 instantly to Prime. Instead, we responded for the community and provided additional functionality DoE, READEXCEL, xlsx support, Win7 support and fixes towards the 14 base Mathcad Classic, while working away at Prime 1.0 in parallel. This gives our existing users a new functionality, fixes, and also a strong product base to face on each of us work hard on Prime.
Mathcad 15 will probably be supported by minor releases for quite a while while the neighborhood becomes happy with Mathcad Prime. We are very excited to discharge Prime 1.0 throughout the end with this year and for getting it in the hands with the community. We ve gotten very positive feedback until now. It has become a long time within the making and lastly the light with the end on the tunnel is resulting into view.
Thanks again, Mike, et al., with the comments.
Thanks to the update Dave I expect getting my practical Prime.
After discovering paper preview bug in Mathcad 14, then learning the fix was available only at cost, PTC had lost a longtime MathCad user. Substitute software was wanted and found: this software Scientific Notebook, from /It is usually a terrific WYSIWYG math word processor coupled together with the MuPad computer algebra system. It s nominal on price, easy make use of, works like a dream, and tech support team is friendly and polite. Goodbye PTC!
Dave B Making me pay to get a version of software that really does work versus the version that I purchased that doesn t work just doesn t make sense in my experience. I manipulate MathCAD since DOS days and I love its functionality. But needing to guess if your page has updated or otherwise not just doesn t work to me.
John Rand Thank you to the link to MacKichen. With PTC fixing bugs only with a different version, I m carried out with PTC, too!
PS Has anyone contacted MacKichen and asked when we turn within a valid MathCAD license do they really give us an amount break?
I ve used Mathcad because the DOS days. MCad 12, 13 and 14 were extrememly lousy versions, stuffed with bugs. I dealt while using bugs described within this blog, but constant crashes caused by memory leaks were the final straw. I tried to remain with Mathcad so long as I could stand it. Spoke directly with PTC about my specific problems, but with no success. I ve taken care of PTC inside past regarding ProE and understand how terrible their customer focus is. I finally abandoned Mathcad after being told that I must purchase a service agreement to solve my defective SW. I went to Mcad 11, the very last good version, simply to support my previous work. I finally swithched to Matlab, realizing that throwing a nice income after bad only helped PTC within expense. I passed around the Mathcad 15 upgrade offer and am unlikely to send back as long as PTC supports it. I will offer Mathcad Prime until SP3 is released AND long-time company is writing raving reviews over it. I don't have any confidence that PTC can return Mathcad to its former g
I are actually using MathCAD for a number of versions. I am currently using 14.
I as if it because I can enter equations that appear to be like equations; and I such as units conversion capability. I can enter an equation, get actual numeric results while ensuring the units of measure balance And then cut and paste the equations and results to a report.
But the non-Academic version is much overpriced. I put it to use much like I use MS Excel for tables and it also should be priced inside same range 300-400 however the new 15 version is priced over 1, 000. That is way too high to the value provided. And, when I look at the extra features in 15 vs 14, I really tend not to see any significant a.
I happen to be a long time user of MathCad and last upgraded from 11 to 14 in 2007. I was using version 14 without problems until my harddrive crashed in March. It continues to be months trying to work together with PTC, and I still cannot get 14 reinstalled to be effective OK! PTC support continues to be dreadful.
I am wanting to reinstall MathCad off of the original CD from 2007, so it's version 14.0.0.163 build 701291152 by using an IBM T42 laptop with XP Pro OS. In case you will not know, the actual MathCad licenses are linked for the MAC address from the computer. So I make sure I was doing the install with my wired MAC address active as well as the wireless MAC address disabled to that the active MAC address would match the one with the license.
I have repeated totally uninstalled MathCad 14 then reinstalled it while using new license I was emailed. The license person Giorgiana who sent me the modern email license opened a help ticket in my opinion, but all I got out of that had been an email telling me to uninstall and reinstall using the new license file. I reported back that would not work, but apparently that email fell to a black hole as I heard nothing back from that.
Why should I give the 333.85 85 download 240 maintenance 8.95 shippingto upgrade to version 15 with or I could pay 325 and select not to take support!! just to acquire a working version of MathCad when I already own MathCad 14? I am planning to put PTC with a blacklist of vendors for my companies, unless somehow this kind of gets straighten out! If anyone has any suggestions, please leave an email here and I will look.
September 5th, 2010 at 13:28
Mathcad can't be compared to Matlab or Mathematica, it s in the league than it s own, and possibly there lies the situation when it concerns PTC. PTC for my part stands for great software, but terrible support, mostly - to my feeling- because support is taken abroad to India or some other country inside east, secondly because PTC is convinced it s software packages are incomparable web-sites, that's only partially true for ProE and Mathcad.
I ve used Mathcad since Mathcad 5.0 plus somewhere back within the mid 90 s and possess done things by using it I never could or are capable of doing on another tool like excel, Matlab or even the like. The big plus with Mathcad could be the user interface, along with its unit awareness. This combination makes engineering and documenting so considerably more intuitive. When used properly, the disposable features can save you many discussions, some time to reasoning effort.
A several months ago, PTC released a survey among users to research what were the rewards and disadvantages of Mathcad. Value for money for sure is usually a big issue, as from the early days a license would have been a cost into tens of dollars, now we're also indeed speaking about 1000, for which has no extra features or improved performance within the contrary even.
Will which make me drop Mathcad? Yes and no. Yes if there exists some real competition available. On the other hand, the bond between CAD ProE and Mathcad is often a very big potential I hope PTC will endeavor to materialize. When Mathcad can be utilized throughout ProE for relations and linked parameters, there s no guessing the size on the impact that may have around the lead duration of design projects I m doing for that company.
September 8th, 2010 at 01:05
After reading each of the comments in my opinion i have realized the Devil.
Why don t you execute a review of Scientific Notebook from MacKichan?
September 22nd, 2010 at 13:29
Try SMath just to find out what only 1 man are capable of doing. I guaranty you would be rather surprised.
October 20th, 2010 at 15:09
I also used MATHCAD since DOS days, however I fell out with upgrades about MATHCAD 11. When they introduced the XML file saving in 14 it became very unreliable, so I have just continued using 11. I find using units plus the whiteboard well suited for engineering, however I trust other users who say it truly is overpriced, and has now not been imnproved for the while.
December 2nd, 2010 at 18:01
We have a whole new dedicated person to assist with licensing issues. Please send him a communication at, and hubby will fix your issue.
February 12th, 2011 at 23:33
I would have been a MathCad 14 user now gone after new install of Prime on hp workstation running xp. I am having instability problems locking/crashing whole machine anyone else have problems?
Mike B MATHCAD 15 has some issues, installation is quite a bit less smooth as earlier versions due towards the licencing wrapping that comes by it, the PTC site is often slow to gain access to. MATHCAD 15 won t display true colour over a 64bit Windows 7 installation. The contour graphs just don t show in any respect. The work round is always to reduce the colour display to 16bit high colour not exactly what a premium product should do in any respect. PTC ought to do much better than that.
September 3rd, 2011 at 21:59
September 17th, 2011 at 14:49
Last winter I bought MathCAD 15 upgrade from MathCAD 11 and attempted to put in it on my small 64 bit Windows 7 Home Premium computer with Norton 360 antivirus. Norton 360 said the MathCAD software was unsafe and may not let me set it up. I removed the file and also got a refund. I suspected that MathCAD 15 required Windows 7 Professional as opposed to Home Premium, so I have upgraded to Windows 7. I have not retried since. If I tried again will it install?
November 10th, 2011 at 04:15
Interesting comments. I are actually a loyal user since about Mathcad Ver. 6 one in the first Windows versions and possess upgraded the item right along over the years. I stayed with MCAD 2000 for many years until I saw a good deal to upgrade to 14, which I did. Unbeknownst in my experience at any time, I wasn t buying a MATHSOFT product, but something from PTC. When I first learned from the change, and seen that PTC were the identical bunch that created PRO/Engineer which I haven't ever used, but am acquainted with through colleagues who swear by it I thought it became a good thing. As if.
Soon following the purchase, I discovered that the old user paradigm, single-license users, was basically gone, and this PTC had introduced the standard and godforsaken business model with the big, ginormous engineering/technology user-base with licenses typically bought in quantity because of the Boeings, Lockheeds and TRWs on the world. In other words, a bit ol single-license user like myself wasn t even worth contemplating. Oh, they ll give you support if you start handing over hundreds a year in support fees.
Now, this works fine if your are discussing Free-and-Open-Software like Redhat Linux, where they give this product away without cost but charge you with the support. But PTC planned to have it for both: charge a goodly amount to the software AND with the support.
Since then I have virtually stopped using MathCad, finding that almost all of what I need to accomplish can be done perfectly with Excel, to become honest.
I am considering looking at Mathcad Prime, as it does appear to have engineering calcs in your mind that s what I do. So we ll see.
But I am glad to learn that I wasn t alone in thinking PTC s purchase on the Mathcad product was apparently carried out complete ignorance of its member list.
February 10th, 2012 at 02:07
PTCs purchase from the Mathcad product was apparently carried out in complete ignorance of its users list. For some Consultant/Client multiple users, MathcadPTC became extinct by insufficient backward compatibility. No client would like to repay and wait to recode 1000 s of work sheets update to standards, optimize. By same token, the MathSoft knowledge mining collaboratory got deserted. By the end of February 2012 some lucky old collabs can have access to my site MCADeng 50% 2750 pages of Mathcad 11 work sheets.
I manipulate Mathcad since v6 which I got on the very special offer I think it had been 50 or so over a visit to Houston in a very discount shop. I thought that it was great and waas thereafter hookedalthough as usual I expected a lot of. It was ideal for documenting and explaining solutions which regularly were thereafter implemented in Matlab for exploring numerically and plotting. I upgraded at each era up to 2001i there was a couple of intermediate releases with issues nonetheless they didn t cost a bomb and at last 2001i was very good and did most I wanted. Mathcad 11 I never installed although I got a replica automatically the reason why I failed to install it absolutely was PTC s licensing policy I had numerous PC s laptop, work desktop, home desktop, backup laptop and mostly I used the property desktop but occasionally I wanted to work with any one of them so I stuck to 2001i. I did upgrade to Mathcad 14 tied to one computer but was horrified to find so it would not save in 2001i readable format so I stay away from i
So, eventually, and apologies for your verbosity, I got Maple by using an offer which I can create on 2 PC s. I am stunned at the capabilities but I can t yet? I hope prepare documents from the mould of these I can in Matlab 2001i. I suspect that most on this is down to some lack of understanding/knowledge around the MAPLE technique of doing things. Has anyone found an obvious exposition of how to produce the transition from Matlab to Maple to get a simple engineer!
All the under complimentary comments I have seen regarding PTC attitude to users appear totally justified it s a waste, the Mathcad customer base was very enthusiastic Adept Scientific are good on support PTC should pay attention to them often!. I wish Maple had bought Mathcad in order to avoid the patents maze then, that of a product we will have had!
September 23rd, 2013 at 19:38
3D Plots: visualize complex datasets, qualitatively and quantitatively
When the 30-day trial period ends, you automatically keep using PTC Mathcad Express for the unlimited time.
January 29th, 2014 at 00:47
I too discovered MCAD11 to get the last useful version of MCAD. I addition to memory leaks which cause system crashes. Newer releases 13-15 give approximately 11 orders of magnitude error with no warning. PTC help found a way for making version 15 return the proper answer. So what I need to accomplish is check all version 15 use MCAD11. Better yet scrap version 15. MCAD11 hasn t lied for me yet.
My attention was recently drawn to some Google post by JerWei Zhang where he evaluates 234 in several packages and notes which they don t always agree. For example, in MATLAB 2010a we have now 234 4096 that is equivalent to putting 234 whereas Mathematica 8 gives 234 2417851639229258349412352 which can be the identical to putting 234. JerWei s post gives a lot more examples including Excel, Python and Google plus the result is always one of these simple two although to varying numbers of precision.
What surprised me was the fact they disagreed by any means since I considered that the operator precendence rules were an agreed standard across all software products. In this case I d use brackets since I am unclear what the best interpretation of 234 must be but I would've taken it without any consideration that there exists a standard somewhere and this all with the big hitters inside numerical world would follow it.
It is now increasingly common for programmers for making use of GPUs Graphical Processing Units to speed up theirprogramssubstantially. There are three major low-level programming libraries that allow you to accomplish this in languages for instance C; namely CUDA, OpenCL and Microsoft DirectCompute. Of these three, CUDA is one of the most developed however it only creates Nvidia graphics cards.
I am often asked in the event the majorcommercialmath packages support GPU computing and I find myself writing precisely the same summary email again and again. So, here is really a very brief breakdown of what is currently available. I decide to expand the data contained in this particular page after a while so when you have any information regarding GPU computing during these packages then i want to know.
Jacket This is usually a product from your company called AccelerEyes and it is possibly one of the most advanced and well toned GPU solution for MATLAB currentlyavailable. As of version 2.0 it supports both OpenCL and CUDA frameworks.
The Mathworks Parallel Computing Toolbox PCT If you want to try and do your MATLAB GPU computing the officially supported way then this could be the product you may need. As a bonus, what's more, it allows you to produce better use with the multicore processor that probably resides inside your machine. Like many from the offerings on this web site, exactly the CUDA framework is supported therefore you are outside of luck when you don t produce an NVidia graphics card. Even if you need to do have an NVidia graphics card then you certainly still could be out of luck considering that the PCT only supports cards which may have compute level 1.3 or higher double precision only.
CULA is a collection of GPU-accelerated linear algebra libraries using the NVIDIA CUDA parallel computing architecture and yes it has a MATLAB interface.
GPUmat This product seemingly free but is less developed versus the commercial offerings above. Again. it really is CUDA only
OpenCL toolbox The only OpenCL solution for MATLAB I could find. It is free but development appears to have stalled.
Mathematica 8 has support for both CUDA and OpenCL built-in so no need for any add-ons. Furthermore, it supports both single and double precision GPUs so it is possible to experiment with GPU computing on older, cheaper cards.
Maple has already established some CUDA-only GPU support since version 14. On the face of the usb ports, the CUDA package only usually contain one accelerated function Matrix-Matrix multiplication when you load this function it accelerates many functions who use matrix-matrix multiply internally. I ve never found a definitive set of such functions though.
Mathcad 15 and Mathcad Prime have zero support for GPU enhanced computing.
A man I have many time for is Joel Spolsky, author, software developer and previously a plan manager for Microsoft Excel. Way back inside year 2000 he wrote a short article called Things You Should Never Do, Part 1 where his main point was The single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make should be to rewrite your code yourself. He exemplified this principle using products including Quattro Pro and Netscape 6.0.
Not everyone will follow Joel s thesis and it also seems that the managers at PTC, pet owners of Mathcad, are most notable. The last major update of Mathcad was version 14.0 that has been released back 2007 the recent Mathcad 15.0 would be a relatively minor update regardless of the.0 version number. To some outsiders it appeared that PTC were doing very little while using product until it transpired that what they have to were actually doing was a practically complete rewrite in the ground up.