magix samplitude 11 producer downloadkaspersky antivirus 2012 software free downloadmicrosoft office enterprise 2007 free download for windows xpgimp download mac yosemite
Because it s more fulfilling than getting there inside a straight line.
Ever since PTC bought Mathcad by reviewing the original developers, Mathsoft, in 2006 the long run for the product continues to be uncertain. The first PTC-led turmoil the software, Mathcad 14, followed three months later to mixed reviews also it s been very quiet since that time. The only indication of life during the last couple of years has become a few minor bug-fix releases which, to become perfectly frank, is pretty insignificant than the competition.
All of the led me to post an article in June 2009 called Is Mathcad Dying? which garnered a great deal of feedback from the two Mathcad user community and from PTC themselves. The reaction through the user community ranged from people calling me some colourful names by way of those who agreed with a lot of what I said and my way through between. It quickly became apparent that there would be a large user community who have been fervently hoping that PTC would make a move special with Mathcad instead of let it wither and die. These users believe that Mathcad brings something unique towards the technical software landscape; something isn t offered by the likes of Mathematica, MATLAB and Maple and in addition they didn t need it to go away.
In the meantime, some individuals at PTC had a talk with me to express to me that Mathcad is way from dying. I found out that not only became a new launch of Mathcad for the cards Mathcad 15 but them to be also taking care of what was essentially an entire reboot from the system called Mathcad Prime. They had also performed an inside company restructure which included the development of a business unit designed for Mathcad; this, I was told, allows them to do additional with Mathcad than ended up being done before. It all sounded extreme fun and I was awaiting a host of public updates but it all went very quiet again.
One of my contacts at PTC sent me a tweet the other day to say that I could possibly be interested inside a blog post at and he was right. Finally, anything that I ended up being told in confidence is made official and even more besides. Mathcad 15 will likely be released later this season. The date for Mathcad Prime might be a more vague but 2011 looks like a distinct possibility and there will probably be a virtual conference in mid-March where PTC will state us much more about its Mathcad strategy I ve already registered.
I ought to confess that I haven't ever been keen on Mathcad, preferring make use of MATLAB, Mathematica and Maple, but I happen to be deeply astounded by the loyalty shown by several of its long-term users. Some of these users happen to be kind enough to accept time to show me why believe that that Mathcad deserves such allegiance and I now realise that a few of my earlier comments about the product wasn't as well considered as they should have already been. So, I hope that these new developments by PTC not just repays this loyalty but in addition produces a product which I would want to make use of myself.
Update 1st July 2010: Mathcad 15 continues to be released now over four years since a final version if I recall correctly plus the list of additional features appears for being rather underwhelming in the beginning. I ll write more when I get my copy in the event that there is more to publish about. I guess PTC are putting a bunch of their resources into Mathcad Prime today.
January 29th, 2010 at 21:12
Thanks for carrying the the perfect time to post a thoughtful review here. Indeed, we've passionate users and then for that, we're grateful. Weve been hard at work, emphasizing a new product which aims to enhance usability of Mathcad. I understand youre not keen on Mathcad, but thank you for objectivity. Perhaps you could share the reason why you like the other tools over Mathcad. In any event, thanks for that note, therefore we look forward to your continuing coverage and commentary.
February 10th, 2010 at 00:41
Mathcad launched a following because like TurboCad vs AutoCad, Mathcad was originally directed at the low end with the market. The products you prefer are top quality 1, 000, and like AutoCad can't be afforded through the average user.
Sadly, it would appear that PTC desires taking Mathcad as direction. For a single user, you'll be able to catch their 99.00 single user special for Mathcad 14 without any maintenance support or updates. If you want the support, you have to pay over the nose weighed against the 99 cost. I hope that PTC will switch course and keep time frame end market in your mind with Mathcad 15.
February 10th, 2010 at 17:13
ardneh I care for mathematical software in a large UK University so I often worry about educational site-license costs as an alternative to individual licenses. Roughly speaking, an internet site license for Mathcad costs on the same as Maple. Maple is infinitely more capable in my view.
Mike B Mathcad is mainly responsible for me only pain in the past. My first guide to it was in version 12 where there would have been a problem with its xml handling. The practical upshot with this was that it turned out corrupting lots of student s work. I discovered that I could recover their work by hand-editing the xml source but it really took AGES. Mathsoft as that it was then couldn t provide a better solution at any time so I worked in the night for any week recovering over 100 student assessments. Thankfully, the workaround was simple don t save files inside new xml format make use of the old format instead. The academic who I was supporting wasn t pleased with the situation but because I had saved the problem he wasn t hurt a lot that he wished to move from Mathcad.
Version 13 was pretty solid didn t cause me much grief at all but we was required to upgrade to version 14 at short notice. The sudden move from the Maple symbolic kernel into a Mupad one caused this same academic some problems and I were forced to help him rewrite a number of his course notes. Then we were hit because of the Print Preview bug which had been initially blamed on me since I was the guy who had deployed Mathcad to the clusters. People assumed that I were to blame as an alternative to Mathcad itself.
The only positive point for Mathcad, for me, can it be s WYSIWYG whiteboard-like interface. In every far wall it loses for the competition.
The recent updates haven t provided us much affordable.
Its programming language is extremely weak when compared with almost anything.
All accusation in court my opinion certainly. One in the reasons I write this stuff is because, if I am wrong, then someone could eventually put me straight.
February 10th, 2010 at 17:43
I like Mathcad because I can quickly begin a new project following a year of not using Mathcad. And since Mathcad sheets are meant to get shared and also a full package is needed to utilize them, the fact that the latest features are not added quickly into Mathcad helps give new worksheets a wide user base.
But my experience causes me to hedge my bets. Mathcad 13 worked well, when I moved to your new Vista based computer, some graphics wouldn't display properly. The support were to upgrade to Mathcad 14 with the special introductory price. Okay fine. This works okay, nevertheless it crashes when I perform print preview. Support is to find a maintenance package to find the latest maintenance release special introductory pricing though. Okay fine.
Well it s almost time for just a new computer. It may have Windows 7. Will I need to fork over more to find the license moved from a single computer towards the next? The original purchase allowed a transferable license, but that's the company beore PTC.
I am trying mathematica 7 on linux now but the reduced purchase price will not allow me to make use of it for work. It s definitely harder to understand than Mathcad.
Mathcad should want to do something to improve. How long before someone merges Basketnotes, jmath, and Euler into something nearly as effective?
February 11th, 2010 at 10:59
Another gripe I have about mathcad is platform support. A Maple site license same cost as being a Mathcad one give or take allows our users to set up it on Windows, Mac and Linux. Mathcad is windows only and we all get less users capable to take selling point of it.
February 11th, 2010 at 11:00
Kirby I agree Mathematica is harder to learn nevertheless it is so so more than worth it. The things I are capable of doing with just a few lines of code. Same applies to MATLAB and SAGE.
February 15th, 2010 at 15:28
Kirby, The Mathcad Print Preview bug was fixed inside the M020 release. Initially PTC required maintenance to reach that but at some time they changed the minds of men and made it an issue that could be downloaded to get more system. I do not determine if it is still availiable however you should try contacting them again.
I manipulate Mathcad ever since the early 90 s. I have signed up for that conference to discover what Mathcad 15 will bring for the table I will likely upgrade to 15. I was to not impressed with Mathcad 14.O M020. I needed to do a lot of rework on a few of my worksheets to get those to calculate properly using MuPad.
I upgraded to windows 7 and luckily my re-installation of Mathcad 14 went and not using a hitch, and usually run fine under windows 7 after I got an new license file.
I m an engineering student and employ MathCAD, although I ve tried Maple and Mathematica. Despite it s flaws my preference lies with MathCAD mainly because of it s seamless handling of units. All the other programs have very cumbersome unit implementations.
The the one thing I really miss in MathCAD is undoubtedly an improved typesetting feature with table of contents, chapter/sections and the like. The perfect solution could be full LaTeX integration, but that s unlikely to happen.
I ve been dealing with Mathcad for a long time. I don t do just about anything particularly advanced, just utilize it for basic engineering calculations. However, I do find some ridiculous features.
Why can t I customize the calculation order to maneuver across pages so something with the bottom of first page is evaluated before something on the top of page 2. I can get round this using global definitions but the print order is screwed up. Otherwise I just waste an awful lot of screen space.
Also, work needs doing for making the layout more sensible. I need for being able to insert tables with full Mathcad functionality. I either ought to align plenty of matrices or readily excel component and loose it capability.
How does Mathematica or Mample compare? The cumbersome units mentioned by Anders doesn t bode well.
I wouldn't like version 14; plenty of my templates programed looping and matrix manipulation would not work a similar so I whent back in version 2001. I know that there are actually some changes, but who wants to must revisit complex templates and fasten.
Also, I am noticing a tren on the list of resent graduating engineers I must interview applying with my firm who usually are not as informed about MathCAD as that surrounding just several years ago have been. Not even NASA TEC Trens journal is puplishing articles that used MathCAD as before.
Is PTC killing th goose that lays the golden eggs???
I ve been a MathCAD user since version 2 and also have spent many money updating over time to version 14. I have not been pretty pleased with PTC s policies about getting updates although I eventually was able to have M020 version despite the fact that I don t pay for that maintenance agreement.
I recently installed MathCAD 14 onto a Dell Studio XPS Desktop with i7 processor after upgrading from Win7 Home Premium 64-bit to Win7 Pro see to get more computer info. The installation usually have worked OK although program won't plot out mesh plots. I haven t spent enough time about the computer to locate other problems.
I see in PTC s advertisements that Mcad 15 has Win7 support so hopefully they fixed the condition although it could well be nice whenever they came up having a fix for Mcad 14. One with the other what are known as selling points they give is A second MathCAD License FREE. This is really nothing new though the same old license agreement that permitted you to legally put a replica onto a property computer. The only difference will be that they indicate your home use license expires with maintenance. I m uncertain how they decide to enforce this but I don t just like the plan since I occasionally will deliever on MathCAD at your home.
As a substitute for MathCAD I ve been using Octave which can be quite close to Matlab. The price is proper free. I haven t had possible opportunity to try it with Win7.
I do like MathCAD s WYSIWYG whiteboard-like interface plus the units feature nevertheless the alternative software packages are also starting to look better to the price at the same time as devoid of to deal with PTC s poor and dear support.
Anyone else having Win7 complications with MathCAD 14?
I ended up being using Mathcad extensively because the first DOS version was introduced. I remained a loyal customer/user until Mathcad 14. The first impetus to get off Mathcad was caused with the lack of patches or bug fixes. Instead, I was forced to purchase an upgrade to fix an issue that was broken.
Also I believe the marketing policy changed in the future. For example, being a user of Mathcad you'd probably receive an e-mail giving notice of a technology with indicated upgrade price. If you would not upgrade immediately, you'd receive another email at some later time with a brand new, special lower upgrade price. If you waited even longer, you'd probably receive another email with another lower updgrade price. To me, this became a terrible business practice. That form of marketing coupled with all the numerous bugs inside first turmoil Mathcad 14 was almost enough to avoid using the tool. At some time, I had did start to migrate to Matlab and Maple. The final straw, as we say, was the reality that Mathcad abrubtly moved in the Maple symbolic engine to Mupad. Two many different packages with regards to syntax. Due on the above, Mathcad 14 is my last upgrade. I now use Maple extensively.
With the above mentioned said, and given my exposure to Maple, I believe Mathcad s whiteboard emulation provides improvement over Maple. I do miss by using their interface, however, my new Mathcad experiences 2008, 2009, 2010 have remaining me sorely disappointed.
One thing that puts Mathcad beyond its competitors may be the ability to create very nice-looking documents. I manipulate both Mathematica and Maple likewise as Mathcad, along with the other programs do not do anything whatsoever like what Mathcad does.
I can mix text, graphics, and mathematics however I need to. That, in my experience, can be quite important. I am an educator, and I utilize it to produce handouts an internet-based text for my students. They don t have for being familiar at all while using program to see what I produce from it and to follow what s there. And, it s much easier to complete this with Mathcad than it could be with a word processor.
The nice integration involving the symbolic and numeric capabilities is a plus.
For people that may not all be computer savvy, it s much easier to master than the other software. I teach an application in computational physics, and now we use Mathcad in this course. I would need to spend quite a lot more time teaching syntax with any environment.
Is Mathcad as powerful as the competitors? Well, no; but often you don t need those extra tools. For most tasks, Mathcad has lots of power. It can be faster at some tasks than Maple is.
Thanks on your comments. Which tasks will it be faster than Maple at?
I happen to be using MathCAD because the DOS days As it is possible to see, I am a devoted follower, but because 14 was released, I are already very disappointed. The issue I have isn't trusting when the calculations updated. I have found tough way that 14 on Vista I have confirmed this challenge with others using XP won't always automatically update answers. Sometimes just saving the file will update it yet in other cases I must close and reopen the file.
This one issue is responsible for me to check out other options. Hey PTC, are you currently catching this? And this PTC maintenance game is often a joke. Perhaps they could do this with ProE and other quality code, but they are going to be walking far from their grass roots support base.
I ve been been a lasting MathCAD user considering that the first MathCAD, with regular updates every since, and I just saw a relevant video about MathCAD 15.
I now think that PTC will not have the expertise to deal with MathCAD and haven t had any real expertise simply because bought it. I think that their efforts not just fall short, but you are just plain pathetic.
What we need is really a White Knight to swoop in, take MathCAD off their hands. Promise PTC to complete a job 100 times a lot better than PTC that is to mention, plain and simple good upkeep, and then suggest MathCAD into the thing it should be. That will be more systematic, more complete, more uniform, a primary class API, add multi-CPU capable, etc.
Say! Google, are you currently listening? PLEASE buy mathCAD and make into a World Class product. Pretty please????!!!!!
I would like to view everyone talk up Google buying MathCAD and get the crooks to hire some top notch mathematics types, team these with some good interface designers, and build it into the long term Chrome Operating system, side-by-side and works with all the cool issues that Google is doing.
I are actually a Mathcad user since 1987 when I bought 2.0 DOS. I don't use anything but Mathcad 2000 Pro on XP Pro. The patches have elected it quite usable even though it still crashes more frequently than I like; turning off Automatic Calculation after you re developing or editing a function helps a great prevent crashes. I upgraded to Mathcad 13 on XP Pro and uninstalled it after the few days merely crash, crash, and crash. I am a Civil Engineer along with a huge fan of Mathcad using a ton of functions that I have developed throughout the years. My library could be the reason I will continue to work with 2000 Pro until I retire in a decade; frankly, I don t provide a damn about upgrades since I don t utilise all of 2000 Pro s features anyway. I only hope it is going to run fine on Windows 7 since I will probably need to abandon XP Pro from the near future in order to remain up to date with other software.
Files for Mathcad 15 dlls and exes have version number 14.1.0.436. That is Mathcad 15 is Mathcad 14 including a bit. Note to fit Mathcad 15, Mathcad 14 if present should be un-installed first but this doesn't apply to 11, 12 or 13.
Thanks to the info Paul. This upgrade gets less impressive with the second.
Hi Mike, Thanks to you and each of the readers for ones comments regarding Mathcad 15.0. We always pride ourselves around the passionate community containing grown in the past around Mathcad. We are listening and constantly appreciate feedback, whether it is positive or negative.
Though Mathcad 15.0 may not seem like an essential release, recall that any of us initially planned to look from 14 instantly to Prime. Instead, we responded to your community and provided additional functionality DoE, READEXCEL, xlsx support, Win7 support and fixes for the 14 base Mathcad Classic, while working away at Prime 1.0 in parallel. This gives our existing users newer and more effective functionality, fixes, along with a strong product base to face on in the end work hard on Prime.
Mathcad 15 is going to be supported by minor releases for a while while town becomes confident with Mathcad Prime. We are very excited to produce Prime 1.0 about the end with this year and to have it to the hands on the community. We ve gotten very positive feedback thus far. It is a long time from the making last but not least the light on the end from the tunnel is originating into view.
Thanks again, Mike, et al., with the comments.
Thanks to the update Dave I enjoy getting my on the job Prime.
After discovering printed preview bug in Mathcad 14, then learning the fix was available only at cost, PTC had lost a longtime MathCad user. Substitute software was sought out and found: this system Scientific Notebook, from /It is often a terrific WYSIWYG math word processor coupled using the MuPad computer algebra system. It s nominal on price, easy to make use of, works like no bodies business, and tech support team is friendly and polite. Goodbye PTC!
Dave B Making me pay for the version of software that really does work versus the version that I purchased that doesn t work just doesn t make sense in my experience. I purchase MathCAD since DOS days and I love its functionality. But being forced to guess in the event the page has updated you aren't just doesn t be employed by me.
John Rand Thank you with the link to MacKichen. With PTC fixing bugs only with a fresh version, I m completed with PTC, too!
PS Has anyone contacted MacKichen and asked whenever we turn in the valid MathCAD license can they give us a cost break?
I ve used Mathcad since DOS days. MCad 12, 13 and 14 were extrememly lousy versions, brimming with bugs. I dealt while using bugs described within this blog, but constant crashes caused by memory leaks were the past straw. I tried to keep with Mathcad provided that I could stand it. Spoke directly with PTC about my specific problems, but with no success. I ve managed PTC from the past regarding ProE and learn how terrible their customer focus is. I finally abandoned Mathcad after being told that I must get a service agreement to repair my defective SW. I went time for Mcad 11, the final good version, and then support my previous work. I finally swithched to Matlab, realizing that throwing big money after bad only helped PTC inside my expense. I passed for the Mathcad 15 upgrade offer and am unlikely to send back as long as PTC supports it. I will pass around Mathcad Prime until SP3 is released AND long-time industry is writing raving reviews concerning this. I do not have confidence that PTC can return Mathcad to its former g
I are actually using MathCAD for a few versions. I am currently using 14.
I as it because I can enter equations that appear to be like equations; and I such as the units conversion capability. I can enter an equation, get actual numeric results while ensuring the units of measure balance And then cut and paste the equations and results right into a report.
But the non-Academic version is much overpriced. I put it to use much like I use MS Excel for tables and yes it should be priced inside the same range 300-400 though the new 15 version is priced over 1, 000. That is too high for that value provided. And, when I look at the additional features in 15 vs 14, I really tend not to see any significant brand new ones.
I are actually a long time user of MathCad and last upgraded from 11 to 14 in 2007. I have been using version 14 without having problems until my hard disk drive crashed in March. It is months seeking to work with PTC, and I still cannot get 14 reinstalled to be effective OK! PTC support continues to be dreadful.
I am seeking to reinstall MathCad from the original CD from 2007, making it version 14.0.0.163 build 701291152 while on an IBM T42 laptop with XP Pro OS. In case you usually do not know, the actual MathCad licenses are linked towards the MAC address in the computer. So I make sure I was doing the install with my wired MAC address active as well as the wireless MAC address disabled to that the active MAC address would match the one for your license.
I have repeated totally uninstalled MathCad 14 and after that reinstalled it while using the new license I was emailed. The license person Giorgiana who sent me the brand new email license opened a help ticket personally, but all I got out of that had been an email telling me to uninstall and reinstall together with the new license file. I reported back that didn't work, but apparently that email fell in to a black hole as I heard nothing back from this.
Why should I give the 333.85 85 download 240 maintenance 8.95 shippingto upgrade to version 15 with or I could pay 325 and judge not to take support!! just to obtain a working version of MathCad when I already own MathCad 14? I am going to put PTC on the blacklist of vendors for my companies, unless somehow this does get straighten out! If anyone has any suggestions, please leave a note here and I will visit.
September 5th, 2010 at 13:28
Mathcad can not be compared to Matlab or Mathematica, it s in the league of computer s own, along with perhaps there lies the situation when it concerns PTC. PTC for my part stands for excellent software, but terrible support, mostly - to my feeling- because support is taken abroad to India or some other country from the east, secondly because PTC is convinced it s software programs are incomparable web-sites, that is only partially true for ProE and Mathcad.
I ve used Mathcad since Mathcad 5.0 plus somewhere in the mid 90 s and possess done things by using it I never could or is able to do on another tool like excel, Matlab and the like. The big plus with Mathcad would be the user interface, put together with its unit awareness. This combination makes engineering and documenting so considerably more intuitive. When used properly, the disposable features can save you a great deal of discussions, some time to reasoning effort.
A several months ago, PTC released a survey among users to research what were the huge benefits and disadvantages of Mathcad. Value for money for sure is really a big issue, as inside early days a license was obviously a cost into tens of dollars, now we're also indeed dealing with 1000, for almost no extra features or improved performance within the contrary even.
Will that will make me drop Mathcad? Yes and no. Yes if there exists some real competition available. On the other hand, the bond between CAD ProE and Mathcad is usually a very big potential I hope PTC attempt to materialize. When Mathcad works extremely well throughout ProE for relations and linked parameters, there s no guessing the size with the impact which could have within the lead period of design projects I m doing with the company.
September 8th, 2010 at 01:05
After reading all of the comments in my opinion i have discovered the Devil.
Why don t you perform review of Scientific Notebook from MacKichan?
September 22nd, 2010 at 13:29
Try SMath just to find out what merely one man are capable of doing. I guaranty which you would be rather surprised.
October 20th, 2010 at 15:09
I also purchased MATHCAD since DOS days, however I fell out with upgrades about MATHCAD 11. When they introduced the XML file saving in 14 it became very unreliable, so I have just continued using 11. I find the utilization of units along with the whiteboard great for engineering, however I go along with other users who say it can be overpriced, and has now not been imnproved to get a while.
December 2nd, 2010 at 18:01
We have a brand new dedicated person to aid with licensing issues. Please send him a communication at, and hubby will fix your condition.
February 12th, 2011 at 23:33
I would be a MathCad 14 user now gone to live in new install of Prime on hp workstation running xp. I am having instability problems locking/crashing whole machine any else have problems?
Mike B MATHCAD 15 has some issues, installation is quite a bit less smooth as earlier versions due to your licencing wrapping that comes along with it, the PTC site is often slow to gain access to. MATHCAD 15 won t display true colour over a 64bit Windows 7 installation. The contour graphs just don t show in any way. The work round should be to reduce the colour display to 16bit high colour not that of a premium product should do whatsoever. PTC should do a lot better than that.
September 3rd, 2011 at 21:59
September 17th, 2011 at 14:49
Last winter I bought MathCAD 15 upgrade from MathCAD 11 and attempted to setup it in my 64 bit Windows 7 Home Premium computer with Norton 360 antivirus. Norton 360 said the MathCAD software was unsafe and wouldn't normally let me do the installation. I removed the file along with a refund. I suspected that MathCAD 15 required Windows 7 Professional as an alternative to Home Premium, so I have upgraded to Windows 7. I have not retried since. If I tried again would it not install?
November 10th, 2011 at 04:15
Interesting comments. I happen to be a loyal user since about Mathcad Ver. 6 one on the first Windows versions and still have upgraded the product or service right along over the years. I bound to MCAD 2000 for a few years until I saw a excellent deal to upgrade to 14, which I did. Unbeknownst in my experience at enough time, I wasn t investing in a MATHSOFT product, but a program from PTC. When I first learned in the change, and remarked that PTC were exactly the same bunch that create PRO/Engineer which I haven't ever used, but am informed about through colleagues who swear by it I thought it became a good thing. As if.
Soon following the purchase, I found that the old user paradigm, single-license users, was essentially gone, which PTC had introduced the normal and godforsaken business model on the big, ginormous engineering/technology user-base with licenses typically bought in quantity with the Boeings, Lockheeds and TRWs from the world. In other words, a bit ol single-license user like myself wasn t even worth planning on. Oh, they ll you if you start shelling out hundreds per annum in support fees.
Now, this works fine if your are discussing Free-and-Open-Software like Redhat Linux, where they give the item away free of charge but charge you for that support. But PTC desired to have it for both: charge a goodly amount for that software AND to the support.
Since then I have just about stopped using MathCad, finding that the majority of what I need to accomplish can be done perfectly with Excel, being honest.
I am thinking about looking at Mathcad Prime, as it does appear to have engineering calcs planned that s what I do. So we ll see.
But I am glad to understand that I wasn t alone in thinking PTC s purchase in the Mathcad product was apparently carried out in complete ignorance of its users list.
February 10th, 2012 at 02:07
PTCs purchase with the Mathcad product was apparently carried out in complete ignorance of its users list. For some Consultant/Client multiple users, MathcadPTC became extinct by not enough backward compatibility. No client is able to repay and wait to recode 1000 s of work sheets update to standards, optimize. By same token, the MathSoft knowledge mining collaboratory got deserted. By the end of February 2012 some lucky old collabs should have access to my site MCADeng 50% 2750 pages of Mathcad 11 work sheets.
I manipulate Mathcad since v6 which I got on the very special offer I think it absolutely was 50 or so on the visit to Houston in the discount shop. I thought it turned out great and waas thereafter hookedalthough as usual I expected an excessive amount of. It was ideal for documenting and explaining solutions which will were thereafter implemented in Matlab for exploring numerically and plotting. I upgraded at each era up to 2001i there are a couple of intermediate releases with issues nevertheless they didn t cost a bomb and in the end 2001i was excellent and did most I wanted. Mathcad 11 I never installed although I got a replica automatically the key reason why I wouldn't install that it was PTC s licensing policy I had many PC s laptop, work desktop, home desktop, backup laptop and mostly I used your home desktop but occasionally I wanted to work with any one of them so I stuck to 2001i. I did upgrade to Mathcad 14 on a one computer but was horrified to find so it would not save in 2001i readable format so I don't utilize i
So, eventually, and apologies to the verbosity, I got Maple upon an offer which I can put in place on 2 PC s. I am thankful for the capabilities but I can t yet? I hope prepare documents from the mould of the I can in Matlab 2001i. I suspect that most in this is down with a lack of understanding/knowledge in regards to the MAPLE means of doing things. Has anyone found a transparent exposition of how for making the transition from Matlab to Maple for just a simple engineer!
All the under complimentary comments I have seen regarding PTC attitude to users appear totally justified it s unfortunate, the Mathcad customers was very enthusiastic Adept Scientific will always be good on support PTC should tune in to them often!. I wish Maple had bought Mathcad to prevent the patents maze then, such a product we're able to have had!
September 23rd, 2013 at 19:38
3D Plots: visualize complex datasets, qualitatively and quantitatively
When the 30-day trial period has expired, you automatically keep using PTC Mathcad Express on an unlimited time.
January 29th, 2014 at 00:47
I too have realized MCAD11 to become the last useful version of MCAD. I addition to memory leaks which cause system crashes. Newer releases 13-15 give up to 11 orders of magnitude error suddenly. PTC help found a way to generate version 15 return the proper answer. So what I need to try and do is check all version 15 assist MCAD11. Better yet scrap version 15. MCAD11 hasn t lied in my opinion yet.
My attention was recently drawn with a Google post by JerWei Zhang where he evaluates 234 in several packages and notes that they can don t always agree. For example, in MATLAB 2010a we've 234 4096 which can be equivalent to putting 234 whereas Mathematica 8 gives 234 2417851639229258349412352 which is a similar as putting 234. JerWei s post gives additional examples including Excel, Python and Google and also the result is always one of these simple two although to varying numbers of precision.
What surprised me was the truth that they disagreed whatsoever since I belief that the operator precendence rules were an agreed standard across all software products. In this case I d use brackets since I am undecided what the right interpretation of 234 needs to be but I might have taken it with no consideration that there exists a standard somewhere knowning that all from the big hitters inside the numerical world would follow it.
It has become increasingly common for programmers to produce use of GPUs Graphical Processing Units to speed up theirprogramssubstantially. There are three major low-level programming libraries that allow you to complete this in languages for example C; namely CUDA, OpenCL and Microsoft DirectCompute. Of these three, CUDA could be the most developed but it really only creates Nvidia graphics cards.
I am often asked in the event the majorcommercialmath packages support GPU computing and I find myself writing the identical summary email continuously. So, here is often a very brief breakdown of the items is currently offered. I intend to expand the details contained with this page with time so should you have any info on GPU computing over these packages then permit me to know.
Jacket This is really a product from your company called AccelerEyes and is particularly possibly the sophisticated and beautifully shaped GPU solution for MATLAB currentlyavailable. As of version 2.0 it supports both OpenCL and CUDA frameworks.
The Mathworks Parallel Computing Toolbox PCT If you want to complete your MATLAB GPU computing the officially supported way then this could be the product you would like. As a bonus, furthermore, it allows you for making better use with the multicore processor that probably resides within your machine. Like many from the offerings on these pages, merely the CUDA framework is supported which means you are away from luck should you don t come with an NVidia graphics card. Even if one does have an NVidia graphics card you then still may very well be out of luck because the PCT only supports cards that contain compute level 1.3 or higher double precision only.
CULA can be a set of GPU-accelerated linear algebra libraries using the NVIDIA CUDA parallel computing architecture and it also has a MATLAB interface.
GPUmat This product is entirely free but is less developed compared to the commercial offerings above. Again. it really is CUDA only
OpenCL toolbox The only OpenCL solution for MATLAB I could find. It is free but development appears to have stalled.
Mathematica 8 has support for both CUDA and OpenCL internal so no need for just about any add-ons. Furthermore, it supports both single and double precision GPUs so you may experiment with GPU computing on older, cheaper cards.
Maple has already established some CUDA-only GPU support since version 14. On the face of computer, the CUDA package only generally seems to contain one accelerated function Matrix-Matrix multiplication but once you load this function it accelerates many functions designed to use matrix-matrix multiply internally. I ve never found a definitive report on such functions though.
Mathcad 15 and Mathcad Prime have zero support for GPU enhanced computing.
A man I have many time for is Joel Spolsky, author, software developer and previously a course manager for Microsoft Excel. Way way back in the year 2000 he wrote a write-up called Things You Should Never Do, Part 1 where his main point was The single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make should be to rewrite your code over completely from scratch. He exemplified this principle using products including Quattro Pro and Netscape 6.0.
Not everyone will follow Joel s thesis and yes it seems that the managers at PTC, pet owners of Mathcad, are one of them. The last major update of Mathcad was version 14.0 which had been released last 2007 the recent Mathcad 15.0 would have been a relatively minor update rapidly.0 version number. To some outsiders it appeared that PTC were doing very little while using product until it transpired that what they have to were actually doing was a practically complete rewrite from your ground up.
That rewrite has now been released from the form of Mathcad Prime 1.0. I don t have my hands on a duplicate yet so I are actually scouring the net to try and determine precisely what this new edition does right and what it really does wrong. Here s what I ve found thus far.
Mathcad Prime 1.0 doesn't have precisely what Mathcad 15 has. Jackov Kucan, Director of development at PTC, has publicly stated so it won t be until Prime 3.0 that users is going to be able to retire Mathcad 15 and migrate to Prime.
Relating on the above point, there's a thread from the PTC Forums where several users are calling Mathcad Prime a large step backwards. Not everyone agrees though.
According to one on the discussion threads above, Mathcad Prime doesn t include several waste functionality symbolics, 3d graphs and animation which are considered bog standard by competitors like Maple and Mathematica. I haven t confirmed this yet. confirmed by email at a PTC employee
At some time of writing, all purchasers of Mathcad Prime 1.0 will likely receive Mathcad 15. Mathcad Prime 1.0 might be installed side-by-side with any previous versions of Mathcad. source
In the UK, Mathcad Prime currently costs
Another useful discussion thread is certainly one started by PTC where they ask What latest features do you want to find out in Mathcad Prime?
The aggregate score based around the apps rating, quantity of users, along with a number of other parameters closely related to user satisfaction.
The most effective score is 10.
No specific information on version 0.7. Please visit the leading page of Pro Pilkki 2 on Software Informer.
LAN Search Pro can be a free utility for fast file searching across your LAN.
It is really a great tool for all kind of users to convert MP3 Files to ringtones.
This program requires Microsoft Word and WinFax PRO/TalkWorks PRO.
XP Pro IIS Admin permits you to create multiple websites on Windows Pro.
Enter your mobile number or email below and well post you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you may start reading Kindle books in your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To receive the free app, enter your email address contact info or cellphone number.
Find the many books, read around the author, and even more.
This bar-code number permits you to verify that youre getting just the right version or edition of an book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and price compare.
FREE return shipping in the end with the semester.
Access codes and supplements aren't guaranteed with rentals.
Fulfillment by Amazon FBA is often a service currently sellers that lets them store a few in Amazons fulfillment centers, so we directly pack, ship, and supply customer service for these particular products. Something produce your own . youll especially enjoy: FBA items be eligible for a FREE Shipping and.
To Rent, select Shipping State from options above
Using the authors considerable experience with applying Mathcad to engineering problems, Essential Mathcad introduces the strongest functions and features of the program and teaches the way to apply the crooks to create comprehensive calculations for almost any quantitative subject. The simple, step-by-step approach makes this book the perfect Mathcad text for professional engineers likewise as engineering, science, and math students. Examples from your variety of fields demonstrate the electricity and utility of Mathcads tools, as well as demonstrating how other software, for example Excel spreadsheets, may be incorporated effectively. A full version of Mathcad v15 can be obtained by utilizing the registration code included from the front on the book North America only. The included applications are for educational purposes only.
This shopping feature continues to load items. In order to navigate out with this carousel please make use of your heading shortcut step to navigate to your next or previous heading.
Essential PTC Mathcad Prime 3.0: A Guide for New and Current Users
Matlab, Third Edition: A Practical Introduction to Programming and Problem Solving
Brent Maxfield is really a Professional Structural Engineer in Utah as well as a Professional Civil Engineering in California. He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Brigham Young University which has a degree in Civil Engineering and earned a Master of Engineering Management degree. He is active in professional associations, having served for the Board of Directors with the Structural Engineers Association of Utah and inside the Structural Advisory Committee for the Utah Uniform Building Codes Commission. He has utilized Mathcad extensively for up to 20 years. In Essential Mathcad, Maxfield shares his vast Mathcad experience and knowledge.
Publisher: Academic Press; 2 edition June 5, 2009
Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds
Brent Maxfield comes from Salt Lake City, Utah. This is definitely an ideal place for him as a result of his love for outdoor activities. He loves hiking and skiing inside nearby mountains, and in addition loves to explore the red rock canyons and deserts seen in Southern Utah.
Brent Maxfield can be a registered Professional Structural Engineer from the State of Utah. He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Brigham Young University having a degree in Civil Engineering and earned a Master of Engineering Management degree from BYU. He may be a practicing structural engineer for 3 decades.
He was awarded the 2012 Utah Engineer from the Year from the Utah Engineers Council. He is active in professional associations having served within the Board of Directors in the Structural Engineers Association of Utah and within the Structural Advisory Committee to your Utah Uniform Building Codes Commission.
He provides PTC Mathcad extensively for twenty years. In Essential PTC Mathcad Prime 3.0 Maxfield shares his vast PTC Mathcad experience and knowledge.
This book gives very detailed info about the features in Mathcad 14. I found the book to become extremely useful. The CD provides a full working Academic version of Mathcad 14. As a previous reviewer said, the Print Preview button doesnt work, but that isnt a great deal of a problem, since this can be a WYSIWYG program. Unlike the prior reviewer, I found you can print the worksheet, provided that you want to print it directly, without using printed preview first.
Its a wonderful book and CD with an awesome program.
Thank you for the feedback.
Sorry, we didn't record your vote. Please try again
I bought the product because I am choosing a graduate class in unsaturated soil mechanics as well as the professor asked us to submit our HW using mathematical software. Mathcad is his software usually chosen. I found the 1st edition of Maxfields book inside the university library and thought it somewhat helpful. When I found this new edition was available, I ordered it to have a replica for myself.
This update makes the ebook far more useful compared to first edition because in the great increase within the number of example problems. It has solved the problem turn Mathcad to a tool by investing a context on how this program works and behaves. For me, this will be relevant because as the program help files are of help, many in the error messages are on the I found the issue, now its your turn! variety and ultizing this book has reduced the problem identify the issues. I anticipate using Mathcad which book for some time for you to come and even though I still use a few difficulty with some in the quirks with the program itself, I are actually able to overcome nearly all of them by reading it. As I expand my use from the more advanced features on the program, I will likely be consulting this book before I use each new feature.
This book has become a great help because of the organization. It is organized into an introductory section, basic tools, advanced tools and organizing calculations. As I am still learning Mathcad, I still believe it is most useful anytime I employ a question to first look at the intro section, then go for the more advanced sections. My only complaint with this book is usually a rather skimpy index.
All in all of the, a well-written book and I would recommend it.
The text might be useful to your engineering student who's learning basic professional subjects and MATHCAD with the same time. As an experienced structural engineer but a first time to MATHCAD, I found this text for being minimally useful in addition to the MATHCAD14 help files. I dutifully started work throughout the examples inside the book, which I found to become rather trivial; I gave up after the while as I wasnt learning anything new. The section on symbolic calculations was interesting, as were the Solve Block examples as I we had not utilized these MATHCAD features. Overall, however, I didnt find much value from the book.
Several in years past I used the primary edition with this book to aid train a small grouping of about 20 newly-hired technical staff with recently-received degrees in areas between physics, mechanical, chemical, materials, electrical, and controls. We used Mathcad tutorials, on-line PTC service desk, and a couple of text books including this by Brent Maxfield. I recently purchased the next edition on this book and think it can be a significantly improved reference text that's useful for newcomers and experienced users of Mathcad to know or refresh their skills.
This is really a great book! Its wonderfully written and supplies great explanations and a lot of great examples to aid you get started, and at ease with using Mathcad. As previously stated in another review, the ebook includes an academic license of Mathcad 14 which I installed without issue. In fact I have not experienced any problems whatsoever while using print preview function, and Ive used the application on my own machine windows 7 pro, with windows update print drivers likewise as a few with the computers on campus custom built win7 machines.
The book is ok, however it said it were built with a CD also it did not. Very disappointing!
Returning university, I quickly realized I had to not simply remember material Id learned a long time ago, but I needed to master or re-learn many programs to help you complete my work. Mathcad is one of these programs. I searched our university library for helpful reference books but emerged short: some were outside of date, others were poorly written, still others focused on with all the program for just a specific field.
Brent Maxfield has produced the sunday paper that is quite helpful. Its written clearly and is also general enough to assist people from the variety of disciplines but isnt so general the reason is useless. I had already tried to master Mathcad in my own so was familiar together with the basics. Because of the, I didnt utilize this book to train me how to utilize the program. Instead, it serves like a ready reference beside my computer as I work. Ive used this book for approximately six months now and still have yet to check to it for a thing that it isn't going to contain. The organization in the book is unlike some features in Mathcad. The index is comprehensive making what Im in search of easy to unlike the support files in Mathcad. His blend of explanation and examples allow it to become very all to easy to implement what Im trying to try and do.
In short, I was gonna cast aside Mathcad as too time consuming to find out while inside the midst of academic endeavors when I discovered this book. Thanks to Brent Maxfield, I can make use of the powerful nature of Mathcad to help you me learn and comprehend the engineering material as an alternative to spending excessive time learning the application itself.
This book is criticised by others. In my view, it would be the best work on Mathcad that's obtainable. Read more
Published four weeks ago by Malcolm J. Manwaring
A really good book, with numerous useful applications.
Not yet another reference. It contains many useful examples
Published 5 months ago by George G.
I have already been using Mathcad since 2000, I happen to be using MSN Excel with it plus the Mathcad documentation didnt cover each one of of what I needed to do. Read more
This book can be a must-have for any person starting with MathCad, and even for regular users who arent necessarily expert programmers. Its well spelled out, making for easy reference.
Published on January 15, 2014 by Ronald de la Cruz
This book plus the copy of Mathcad 14 that accompanies it is definitely an excellent bargain and also a good adjunct towards the Help file and users manual that provide Mathcad.
Published on May 18, 2013 by Justin M. Graves
It was on the way of download and make use of right away. I downloaded the program without problem and was practicing the easy-to-follow guide right away.
Published on April 6, 2013 by Norman Alder
Theres problems loading this menu at this time.
Prime members also love FREE Two-Day Shipping and exclusive having access to music, movies, TV shows, and Kindle books.
Y 1996-2016, , Inc. or its affiliates
Below can be a snapshot with the Web page mainly because it appeared on 1/24/2016. This would be the version from the page that has been used for ranking your pursuit results. The page can have changed since it turned out last cached. To see what may have changed minus the highlights, a hIDSER
Amazing hostel, really enjoyed my stay here! All the rooms are incredibly clean along with the staff are super friendly. Free breakfast tea/coffee can be an added bonus where you are able to sit inside common room or balcony and chill with travelers. Who might be a better inspiration than this famous composer? True, the concept for
Your reliable supplier of generic medications.
To proceed please enable Javascript and Cookies with your browser.
Generic Viagra is utilized to treat male Impotence also called Erectile Dysfunction. Also, it continues to be approved by US FDA for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Generic Levitra can be used to treat sexual function problems including Impotence or Erectile Dysfunction.
Generic Amoxil is employed for treating infections brought on by certain bacteria. It is additionally used for some other medicines to take care of H. pylori infection and ulcers on the small intestines. Amoxil is really a penicillin antibiotic. It works by killing sensitive bacteria.
Cialis Super Force is usually a combination medication of tadalafil and dapoxetine used for your treatment of male impotence and rapid ejaculation.
Generic Clomid is useful for treating female infertility.
Kamagra is a fresh medicine manufactured by Ajanta Pharma India useful for treating erectile disorders that face men.
Female Cialis is needed to treat female sexual arousal disorder FSAD and female erectile dysfunction. It provides satisfaction in sexual needs and lasting pleasure.
Generic Propecia is used in treating certain kinds of male pattern hairloss androgenic alopecia that face men. It is usually used to deal with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia BPH of males with an enlarged prostate.
Generic Viagra Soft can be a chewable tablet. Absorbed directly into your bloodstream, it acts faster. It is needed to treat erection problems of males. The time necessary for that medicine to exercise its action is all about half an hour. The effect is maintained for approximately four hours.
Levitra Soft is utilized to treat erection problems that face men. Soft tabs are chewable and absorbed directly in the bloodstream, consequently, they might require a much smaller time and energy to achieve precisely the same result.
Levitra Super Force is usually a combination medication of vardenafil and dapoxetine used for that treatment of male impotence and early ejaculation. Hot offer!
Generic Cialis is utilized to treat erection problems in males. It may be the only drug which is not just fast acting works in a half-hour but can be know to become effective as long as 36 hours, thus making it possible to choose the moment which is just right for you also as your partner. Millions of mankind has benefited from Cialis because it works effectively in mild, moderate or severe Erectile Dysfunction.
Generic Priligy is used to the treatment of ejaculation problems.
Generic Cialis Soft would be the medicine that combines two main characteristics essential for treating male impotence Erectile Dysfunction: fast acting and prolonged effect. You can consider the medicine within the morning and turn into ready for that right moment during that day, evening as well as during the overnight.
Generic Cipro is undoubtedly an antibiotic in the group of drugs called fluoroquinolones. It is needed to treat a variety of bacterial infections, bladder inflammation.
Generic Diflucan is undoubtedly an antifungal antibiotic. It can be used to treat infections a result of fungus, which may invade any part from the body such as the mouth, throat, esophagus, lungs, bladder, genital area plus the blood.
Generic Lasix is useful for treating blood pressure levels or water retention swelling regarding congestive heart failure, liver disease or kidney disease.
Generic Nolvadex is used in treating breast cancer containing spread with sites from the body. It can also be used along to medicines to help remedy other types of cancer of the breast. It is utilized in women that are at high-risk for breast cancer as well as in women with DCIS after surgery and radiation to diminish the risk of developing cancer of the breast.
Generic Synthroid is used by treating low thyroid activity and treating or suppressing different kinds of goiters. It is also in combination with surgery along with other medicines for managing some types of thyroid cancer.
Generic Zithromax is utilized to treat many several types of infections attributable to bacteria, for instance respiratory infections, skin disease, ear infections, and sexually transmitted diseases. In children, it's used to help remedy middle ear infection, pneumonia, tonsillitis, and strep throat.
Generic Levitra Oral Jelly is used in Impotence treatment. This prescription medication is more easily swallowed than tablets and so is suitable for older people and people who have a problem in swallowing.
Levitra Professional also called Staxyn inside US market. It continues to be produced in orally disintegrating tablets, so that it acts faster and has now all merits of vardenafil with the same time.
Country, language and currency